POISONING WELLS
By Israel
Shamir
A spectre haunts the West, a spectre
that was not seen around for quite a while. Exorcized
long ago, it was imprisoned in the dark lab like a
deadly virus, bidding its time. Now, as Israel stoops to
commit the most horrible of crimes, its supporters broke
the seals and removed the magic pentagram.
For over a millennium, we Jews were
connected in the European popular mind with
well-poisoning, to great chagrin of our ancestors. Now,
the fantasies of past become true, as some dark minds
turn tales of old into today’s reality.
Abba Kovner, a Jewish socialist (?)
leader, had tried to poison the sources of Rein. He had
dreamed of exterminating millions of Germans, children,
women, men. He has received the virulent potion from a
man who became afterwards the President of Israel, and
who never regretted nor denied it. His last-minute
cowardice (or a miracle?) saved the heart of Europe. (You
can read about it – no remorse, no shame – in his Life
lovingly depicted by an Israeli historian Anita Shapira.).
It happened half a century ago, but now,
a new sort of poison flushes through the Zionist
tentacles into the wells of Europe and North America. In
the Canadian daily National Post (August 27, 2002),
published by Israel Asper, a great friend of my country,
Daniel Pipes and his gentile sidekick Lars Hedegaard
published an article with an alluring title, “Muslim
extremism: Denmark's had enough”.
Judging by its contents, Canada had
scrapped its ‘hate laws’ that expressly forbid promoting
hatred of ethnic and religious communities.
Pipes-Hedegaard tandem writes:
“Predominantly Muslim immigrants
constitute 5% of the population but consume upwards of
40% of the welfare spending… Muslims are only 4% of
Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of
the country's convicted rapists, an especially
combustible issue given that practically all the female
victims are non-Muslim”.
“They steal our money and rape our
daughters”, - this concept was successfully applied in
past, notably by Adolf Hitler in his Mein Kampf, against
the Jews. Now, it is promoted by the mighty Jewish
propaganda machine, this globe-embracing conglomerate of
Jewish media moguls, obedient journalists, deferential
university professors. Hitler or Stalin never had had
such a network in their disposal. The hate potion is
prepared by professor Lewis, multiplied by Pipes the
journalist, published by Israel Asper, the owner of
almost all Canadian media, and of our Jerusalem Post. It
flows to Conrad Black in England, and to Mort Zuckerman
in the US, and to innumerable Jewish media owners and
editors all over the world.
Maybe our Muslim cousins (4% of
population) supply majority of rapists in Denmark, but
my Jewish brothers (hardly 2% of population) constitute
majority of people who screw all of us: the media
moguls, TV bosses, tax dodgers, multimillionaires,
neo-cons and just conmen. Now, when we know the
statistics of Muslim applications for welfare, let us
see the statistics of Jewish fraud. I doubt all Muslim
and Black welfare addicts can compare with one Mark
Rich.
This mighty machine rolled out the Ku
Klux Klan scaremongering image of a crouching
dark-skinned rapist, lusting the white skin and golden
hair of Aryan maidens of Denmark. Imported from the
great KKK-worshipping silent movie by Griffith, The
Nation Is Born, the racist image opens a new film of Men
in Black II: big Negro with big knife, big teeth and big
prick attacks an innocent White woman in the park. The
film was produced by the creator of Schindler’s List,
the sob story of persecuted Jews.
Still, there is a difference between
Pipes, Zuckerman, Asper, Black and the ordinary racists
of old. The German dictator or the Klan Wizard was
sincere man, who truly and wholeheartedly hated Jews.
Pipes and his kin have no feeling of special hate
towards Blacks or Muslims. For them, there is no
difference between a white goy or a black goy, Muslim
goy or a Christian goy, or indeed a goy and a dog. They
produce their hate potion for others, in preparation of
the great assault in the Holy Land.
II
While the Jewish propaganda mills
produce their output of hate, their potential victims
still argue between themselves. Steven Salaita, a nice
young American-born Palestinian student from Oklahoma,
writes[i]
in the YellowTimes.org: “For the first time in my life,
I was disgusted to receive messages in support of the
Palestinian people”. Why? Because they are sent by
“right-wing ideologues”, as “a number of far-right
racists, David Duke foremost among them, now invoke
Israel's behaviour as a "proof" of inherent Jewish
depravity”.
It would be fairer to convey the main
argument of these “right-wing ideologues” as follows. 1.
There is a great proximity between the behaviour of Jews
in Palestine and behaviour of the Jews elsewhere. 2. The
horrors committed by Jews in Palestine and supported by
Jews of Diaspora, prove presence of a horrific component
of the Jewish policies, practice and ideology elsewhere.
3. The Jews represent a destructive (for others),
dangerous and repulsive ideology and theology, and
should be contained and counteracted. 4. Ideally, people
of Jewish origin should be brought to see the light and
leave their erroneous path; they should become
“non-Jews”.
While the key point (3) is an unpleasant
(for many Jews) notion, it is a non-racist age-long
discourse. It is not a right-wing discourse either, as
this opinion was shared by Karl Marx and Leon Trotsky,
Theodor Herzl and Boruchov, St Paul and Martin Luther.
Zionists were foremost rejecting ‘goodness of Jewry’. A
leading French socialist, P-J Proudhon, perceived the
Jews as supporters of modern bureaucratic, centralised
state. Marx called to free mankind from Jews, and to
de-Judaise Jews.
If Salaita wants to find a total
rejection of the Jews as ideology, he does not have to
go to David Duke. He could look up a book called The
Jewish Question: Marxist Interpretation, by Abram Leon,
a young follower of Trotsky, who perished in the walls
of Auschwitz. Leon (I am grateful to Noam Chomsky who
introduced me to this author) called the Jews,
“people-class”, historically attuned to usury and
exploitation of others. A man of Jewish origin always
could leave ‘the Jews’ and join mankind, wrote Leon.
Salaita notes that “extremist websites
post articles critical of Israel from respectable
publications, many with Jewish authors” and concludes,
“the organizations' hatred of Jews is so strong that
they are willing to employ Jewish voices in order to
promote their agenda. Their naïveté is as striking as
their stupidity”. It is an unexpected and unwarranted
reasoning. Rather, the websites employ voices of people
of Jewish origin who reject the Jewish approach, and
thus they prove their non-racist basis.
Salaita rejects the remote possibility
of linkage between the Jewish behaviour in Palestine and
the Jewish behaviour elsewhere. The apartheid
established by Jews in Israel is not connected to the
policies, ideology and practice of the Jews elsewhere,
in his opinion. Well, this doubtful point of view is
highly comfortable for the Jews in America. They can
support Sharon and retain their angel wings. Maybe it is
young Salaita who is naïve in his desire to disengage
the war in Palestine and the confrontation elsewhere?
The article of Pipes we discussed
earlier is just the latest proof of futility of this
desire. The war for Palestine became a global war, the
World War Three, and in this war, the organised Jewry is
strictly on the side of bad guys. Now they employ the
evil weapon of racist hate, trying to rouse the
Europeans against the Blacks and Muslims everywhere,
from Alabama to Chechnya, from Copenhagen to Kabul. They
should be confronted and defeated, as otherwise they
will poison the wells of mind. We should not allow our
adversary to enforce the Black vs. White, or Christian
vs. Muslim chasm. Instead of discussing David Duke’s
anti-Semitism, we should discuss the anti-Gentilism,
hatred of a goy, so evident in the Jewish-owned media.
If we succeed, the Jewish communities abroad would pay
more attention to their own well-being, and let
Palestine to cool off.
Our war is NOT a total war. Despite
childish remarks of Salaita, no sword of ethnic
cleansing, no threat of physical annihilation hangs over
Jewish heads, as Christians and Muslims always wished to
bring their Jewish brothers to the light, out of their
dark separatism. The enemies of Christ should be shown
the error of their ways, not hurt, that was the
traditional approach of the Church. Even after horrible
holocaust of Palestinian Christians made by Jewish hands
in 614, the Christian rulers retained brotherly
Christian love to the misled Jews and did not punish
them.
That was the Muslim approach as well.
Despite much confrontation and trouble, “the Qaynuqa`
and the Nadir Jewish tribes cooperated with the Prophet
Muhammad, and so did the Jews of Khaybar, after he took
the oasis in 628 (he married the daughter of one of the
chiefs of Nadir)”, reminds me a reader from Virginia.
Later, Jews collaborated happily with the conquering
Arab armies in Syria, North Africa, and Spain, knowing
that the Arabs would give them greater toleration and
protection than their previous rulers.
The Jews and non-Jews would be able to
live together happily, after the Jewish supremacy trend
will be vanquished. However, until it is achieved, we,
the friends of Palestine, should seek understanding and
cooperation with all possible allies, black, white, red,
green or rainbow, as blessed are the seekers of peace.
|