The
Palestinians have no chance, unless we free our souls
from Jewish control.
Gaza: Of Mice and Men
By Israel Adam Shamir
A cat called to the mouse holed up
under the floor: “Come out, you have nothing to worry
about! I have become a pious vegetarian, preparing for
my Hajj, you may play freely”. “Oh wonderful news”,
cried the mouse and ran out of the hole; a moment of the
eternity clock passed, and the mouse found herself in
cat’s claws, goes Nizami’s fable.
This is, in brief, the development of
Gaza crisis that began with Israel’s phoney but much
advertised “withdrawal” (a.k.a. “disengagement”) from
Gaza in summer 2005, followed by their phoney permission
to run democratic elections for the Palestinian
government.
- “Sharon has changed his ways”,
exclaimed the good-meaning Americans and Europeans; “he
– and after him, Olmert – are ready for peace and
reconciliation.”
- “We liberated Gaza”, said Hamas.
- “Oy vey!” cried the settlers.
The cries of joy and sorrow following
the fake withdrawal had not died out, when the real
siege and bombardment of Gaza began. After a few months
of shelling, this real takeover of Gaza and arrest of
all Palestinian leadership completed the picture of a
fat cat playing with the mouse.
Our readers may remember that at the
height of the withdrawal hullabaloo we called (in
Much Ado about Gaza) for everyone to tone down
expectations: an Israeli pull-out is always followed by
a push-in, as in a rape scene. Do not expect to see the
last of them: an Englishman leaves without bidding
farewell, a Jew says his farewells but does not leave,
quoth a Jewish joke. Readers of this list and site were
given, as always, the correct forecast: indeed the Jews
came back.
The intermezzo was quite sad, too.
Gaza after the withdrawal was one of the most depressing
places on earth, with widespread starvation and vast
unemployment, and it was not the Gazans’ fault: whether
under Hamas or Fatah rule, Gaza can’t stand alone; this
narrow strip is surrounded by Israeli troops and barbed
wire, the Gazans have no way to sell their goods or to
import their needs but through Jewish-controlled ports.
Remove the SS men from Auschwitz to its perimeter, give
the camp full autonomy but keep its gates shut from
outside, and you’ll get a picture of Gaza. The Jews
destroyed Gazan industry and trade by their siege: Gazan
fruits and flowers for export withered at Karmi
checkpoint, and a multimillion-dollar investment went
down the drain. Gazans openly regretted their new-found
“independence”, because in the days of Israeli rule they
could make a living working at Israeli factories, and
the Israeli shelling was much more moderate, while
“independent” Gaza was subjected to incessant shelling.
Hundreds of missiles and shells were launched against
this small strip of land daily, killing a few but
ruining the nerves of its residents.
I, for one, know what that means: in
1974, my commando unit spent less than half a year in
the fortified crater of an extinguished volcano some 40
km (25 miles) to the south of Damascus. We were shelled
daily by Syrian artillery, and our light arms could not
respond to their cannons. At the first exiting boom we
would hide in bunkers and wait for the salvo to land.
Sometimes, it was a single shell, sometimes it was
followed by the inhuman squeal of a Katyusha missile. We
had very few casualties: a couple of wounded and one
killed for this whole period of time, but our nerves
were completely shattered. We stopped brushing our teeth
and shaving: it did not make sense when death is so
imminent. We ceased writing letters. Even the periods of
the most intense fighting we went through with dozens of
killed comrades were preferable to the attrition of
incessant shelling. Gazans – children, women, men, -
have endured almost a year of attrition made worse by
aerial booming, something we were free from by virtue of
Israeli air superiority.
Israeli tactics in Gaza resemble the
strategy of “starving into obedience” applied by the
Pentagon to North Vietnam, per the Pentagon Papers,
- the single most evil piece of strategic planning in
the 20th century:
“Strikes at population targets are
likely not only to create a counterproductive wave of
revulsion abroad and at home, but greatly to increase
the risk of enlarging the war with neighbours.
Destruction of locks and dams, however, does not kill or
drown people. By shallow-flooding the rice, it leads
after time to widespread starvation (more than a million
dead?) unless food is provided--which we could offer to
do at the conference table.”
[1]
If the Jews were to bomb a hundred
thousand Gazans to oblivion, probably there would be “a
wave of revulsion”, but destruction, starvation and
thirst are equally efficient, and do not disturb the
world conscience all that much. The destruction of a
Gazan power plant was a shrewd business decision as
well: this American-build and insured station competed
with the Israeli Electric Company for supply of electric
power to Gazans. Even running at half-capacity, the
power station undermined the Jewish supplier’s monopoly.[2]
Now it is gone, and Gazans will have to buy all their
electricity from Jews at a much higher price. Combining
business with pleasure, this destruction also allowed
Jews to “thirst Palestinians” in addition to starving
them as Gaza has no rivers, and electricity is needed to
operate pumps.
Still, in this short time of Gazan
“independence”, Gazans have proven that they are men,
not mice. Their stubborn launching of Kassams were a
sign of their unbroken spirit: they refused to be
starved into obedience. Kassam is hardly a weapon in the
modern meaning of the word. This is a medieval weapon, a
catapult, at best: an iron mote propelled by a simple
device, carrying no explosives. We built and launched
such missiles when we were kids in prep school. Surely,
an iron mote can kill in the unlikely case of a direct
hit, but the chances are small indeed.
Their brave and well-planned raid of
an Israeli siege unit has restored our appreciation of
Gazans’ fighting abilities. It is not a simple thing to
attack tanks with your bare hands. True, Israel utilised
this courageous raid to jumpstart a new invasion of
Gaza, but do not make too much out of this linkage:
Haaretz (29.06.06) revealed that the plans for mass
arrests of Palestinian leadership and for re-invasion
were prepared a long time ago.
The Israeli government referred to
the raid: “a horrific, serious terror attack was carried
out by Palestinian factions, which ended in the deaths
of two soldiers, the injury of an additional soldier,
and the kidnapping of Shalit.” Our friend Jeff
Blankfort wittily quipped: “One would think Shalit was a
little boy walking to the candy store who had been
seized by a notorious child molester and not a soldier
on active duty”.
A Palestinian Christian Professor and
a Knesset Member, Azmi Bishara said well of the
resistance fighters: “Some people chose to respond to
the murder of Palestinian civilians by attacking an
Israeli military installation. They made the hardest
choice, and chose the difficult path. Those who did not
take this path, who did not make this sacrifice, or put
their courage to this test, or suffer trembling nerves
in the darkness of the tunnel, yet who have some
delicacy of feeling towards the pains of the
Palestinians could at least spare this operation the
embarrassment of tainting it as terrorist.”
Yea, when the Jews attack, that’s
war, when they are attacked, it is terror! Uri
Avnery called it “a unilateral war”, on a par with their
“unilateral withdrawals”. But this unilateralism is a
constant feature of Jewish-Native relations: when Jews
attack natives, this is rightful vengeance, when they
get some of it back, it is a pogrom. Long before the
Jews defamed Palestinians as terrorists, they vilified
their previous native neighbours, Poles, Ukrainians,
Russians, Spaniards, Germans as subhuman and vicious
antisemites. If we reject their defamation of
Palestinians, we may re-examine their accusation of
others, and the whole narrative of Jewish suffering will
collapse.
Then, the problem of Palestine, or
rather the problem of Jewish mistreatment of their
‘goyim’ will appear as an old problem, for the way Jews
act today probably is the way they acted – if they could
– yesterday. Long before the apartheid wall spanned
Palestine, the Jews did not allow a native Spaniard to
enter the walled city of Lucena, where they held sway.[3]
Long before they shelled Gaza, they filled
Mamilla Pool in Jerusalem with blood of slaughtered
Christians.
This is a good news for the
descendants of Jews: we were brainwashed into hatred of
‘antisemitic’ mankind; came the Rape of Gaza, and now we
learn that mankind was right and good, while we
misbehaved. It is better to find oneself in the wrong
than to accuse the whole of mankind, for one can always
repent of one’s own ways. It is better to find oneself
shunned for one’s farts, than for one’s race. It is less
honourable, but easier treated.
This understanding has began to seep
into our conscience. A Jaffa man Anwar Sacca wrote in a
letter to Tikkun Magazine: “Through
their [Jewish] history, unfortunately not only for Jews
but for the whole world, they were always
self-destructive supremacists. As a minority living
within any country and enjoying its citizenship, they
always antagonized their fellow citizens by totally
dominating their economy, media, life styles etc...to a
limitless extent which generated dreadful consequences
they had to heavily pay for. The same case applies in
Palestine…”
The Rape of Gaza fits too well into
this centuries-proven pattern. The Jewish leadership
never intended to give their captive goy a chance to
lead normal life. Sooner will a cat turn vegetarian.
Whatever they do, expect the worst. Timeo Danaos et
dona ferentes. “Their good deeds are as dangerous as
their obvious crimes”. In 1880s, Dostoyevsky
prophesised: if and when the Jews get power, they will
skin the goy alive. In Palestine this prophesy is being
realised. This is not a question of innate Jewish
qualities: a Jew can be good and do good, a Jew can
repent, but ‘the Jews’ can’t because this body politic
exists to compete and combat the indigenes, whether in
Palestine or elsewhere.
Ideologically, a Jewish state will do
the Jewish thing, that is, it will fight natives and
combat the Church, whether Christian or Islamic. “If the
Jews of old were to come back”, - wrote Simone Weil, -
“they would destroy our churches and massacre us all”.
“The Jewish tradition is rampantly ethnocentric and
dehumanises outsiders with a gusto that could hardly be
exceeded”, - wrote Ed Herman in his Triumph of the
Market[4].
In the Jewish State, the Jews of old have come back, and
the Jewish tradition has became paramount.
Thus, the Hamas was right in refusing
to recognise the Jewish state: in no way can this state
become a tolerable neighbour, whether ruled by Labour of
Peretz or by Kadima of Olmert, or even in extremely
unlikely case of being ruled by Mr Avnery. This state
has to be dismantled, like the Assassins’
extraterritorial State that once controlled the Middle
East. The Assassins drew their power from their ability
and preparedness to assassinate the prominent leaders of
Crusaders and Muslims, while leaving alive only weak
rulers who did not dare to touch them.
The Jews do the same: sometimes, by
sword, sometimes, by their money, sometimes, by their
media, but no strong leader has emerged within their
sphere of influence.
* Assassinations by media are the
most frequent, and this topic is well covered. If they
decide to kill a person by their media, they try to
eliminate every reference to his name; if it does not
work, they attack him ad hominem, spreading lies
and distortions. This treatment was recently given to
the leaders of Iran: the Jewish press spread a lie that
the Iranians intend to adorn every Jew with a yellow
star. Their lie was quickly disproved, but the
retraction appeared on far-away pages of newspapers,
while the damage was already done. The US politicians
who tried to go against Jewish orders were usually
assassinated by Jewish media and found themselves in the
wilderness.
* Assassinations by money are equally
frequent: enough to mention prominent American
industrialist Henry Ford who tried to combat Jewish
influence. Eventually he received an offer he could not
refuse; he apologised, burned his books, and repented.
He preferred that to destruction of his car-making
empire.
* Assassinations by sword were done
when nothing else worked: Lord Moyne, Folke Bernadotte,
Sheikh Yassin. Hundreds of Palestinian leaders were
assassinated by Jews. Recent
publication of Haaretz tells of operation Zarzir
(Starling), a Jewish “comprehensive, operational plan, a
nationwide program of assassinations” of enemy leaders,
both political (Emile Houri) and military leaders, such
as Hassan Salameh and Abdel Khader al-Husseini. Khaled
Meshal escaped their assassins just by chance – they
tried to drop poison into his ear in a rather
Shakespearian fashion.
In the days of old, salvation came
from unexpected corner: West Asia was conquered by
Mongols and these ruthless warriors flushed the
Assassins out of their mountain retreats and utterly
destroyed their conspiracy. Their harmless descendants
are Ismailis, who live peacefully and do not disturb
peace anymore. If we can’t solve the problem, some new
Mongols will dismantle the State of Sodom and render
descendants of Jews as harmless as Ismailis.
Then, there is a milder way of
dealing with the problem by introducing reciprocity
instead of unilateralism. A medieval chronicle reports
that the Jewish King of Khazar once said to a Muslim
visitor: “We would destroy all the churches and mosques
in our kingdom right away, but we can’t for fear that
they will destroy the synagogues in Baghdad and
Constantinople”. Indeed, if in response to the Jewish
destruction of Gaza’s power plant, an Israeli power
plant in Caesarea were erased, and the Jews had to
survive our summer without air-conditioners, they
wouldn’t do it again. If the Jews in Europe were limited
to the rights their brethren granted to Palestinians,
Palestine would be free tomorrow.
But why should we indulge in
daydreaming? Who could do such a deed? The Arabs are
subdued. The US conquest of Iraq eliminated the last
independent Arab state. Iran is being pushed hard and
this powerful Muslim state is happy every day it is not
bombed. Syria is in the crosshairs of the US whom the
French are helping them to contain Damascus. The noble
fighters of Hizbullah saved the Arab dignity by their
self-sacrificing exploits, but they can’t hurt the
monster. Never before – since Saladin – has the Middle
East been so helpless and powerless.
Europe and America are equally
subdued: none of prominent public figures dared to
object to the Jewish Drang nach Gaza. “Why do you keep
quiet?”
exclaimed Jonathan Steele in the Guardian
(July 6, “Europe's response to the siege of Gaza is
shameful”). Don’t you know the answer, Mr Steele?
Whoever tried, was invariably defamed as “antisemite”
and “neonazi”, and lost his living and his good name. I
know, I tried to defend the Palestinians, and was
stabbed in the back by a couple of nice Palestinian
activists,
Mr Ali Abunimah and Mr
Nigel Perry of Electronic Intifada, followed by a
cabal of other pro-Palestinian activists. Only after
that did the heavy guns of Jewish media – like the
Times, or Wikipedia – go into action. These good
activists deserve some credit for the present
destruction of Palestine: if an Israel Shamir from Jaffa
is attacked like that, what could expect a John Smith
from Wisconsin? Whoever tried to defend Palestinians,
got this treatment, unless he observed the PC rule of
never uttering the J-word. Still, I do not regret
speaking the truth, for if we keep silent, the stones
will cry out.
The Palestinians have no chance,
unless we free our souls from Jewish control. And here
we may turn to the second J-word, more mighty than the
first: Jesus. The present subservience of the West began
with a minor step. In 1960s, the Western churches
removed from their liturgy a prayer “Oremus et pro
perfidis Judaeis”, “Let us pray for perfidious Jews that
our God and Lord will remove the veil from their hearts
so that they too may acknowledge the light of thy truth
which is our Lord Jesus Christ and be delivered from
their darkness”. This was considered “antisemitic”,
though it is a far cry from the Jewish prayer “Shepokh
Hamatha”, “Lord, vent your fury upon goyim who do not
know your name”. But the Jews preserved their prayer of
vengeance, while misled and subdued Christians dropped
their prayer of mercy. Say this prayer today, say it in
your church, dismiss a priest who dares it not, and
tomorrow you will not writhe in face of Jewish
displeasure, and Gaza – and your soul - will be saved.
And if your prayer will be answered, the Jews will be
saved, too.
Language editing by Ken Freeland
[1] The
Pentagon Papers, Gravel Edition, Volume 4
Chapter I, "The Air War in North Vietnam,
1965-1968," pp. 1-276. Boston: Beacon Press,
1971
[3] History
of Jews in Christian Spain by Yitzhak Baer,
Philadelphia v.1
[4] South
End Press, Boston 1995 p 131