|
Carter and the Swarm
by Israel Shamir
Publication of Jimmy Carter's Palestine:
Peace Not Apartheid is a great event for America and for all
of us. It's not that Carter said anything we did not already
know about Palestine. Before Carter,
we already knew that the Zionists had established a racist
apartheid regime in the Holy Land where Jews have rights, and
goyim have duties. Before Carter
we knew a native Palestinian has no right to vote, move or
work freely in his land -- that he is locked up behind the
twenty-foot wall. Before Carter
we knew that the US support allowed the atrocities to occur
and the apartheid regime to entrench. But what we did not know
was that there are prominent Americans who would dare the wrath
of organised Jewry and spell it out loud.
Why did President Carter do it? Why did he
risk his peaceful old age and gently fading glory to endure an
attack by Israel's Fifth Column as merciless as the Four
Columns' onslaught on Gaza? He was moved by compassion, that
supreme Christian virtue of feeling together with the suffering
and the oppressed. He saw the suffering of Palestine and he
could not keep quiet. He upheld an honourable American
tradition: that of Mark Twain who condemned the US atrocities in
Philippines, that of Henry Thoreau speaking against the Mexican
War. This is a universal tradition, too: Multatuli unmasked the
Dutch atrocities in Indonesia, Roger Casement did it to the
Belgians in Congo, Radishchev bewept the fate of the Russian
peasant. And their voices changed our world, though not
immediately. Carter is not a radical -- a man of hotter temper
would call to eliminate the infamy called «The Jewish State»
altogether. Carter's message is soft and gentle; so soft and
compassionate that only the arrogant and power-intoxicated
won't be able to live with it. Others (including me) have been
harder and more explicit, but then, we others weren't former US
presidents.
Why now? The apartheid system in Palestine
was bad enough ten years ago to warrant his intervention, but
this despondent helplessness we now witness is a new phenomenon.
The hope kept alive by Camp David, by peace with Egypt, by the
Madrid and Oslo conferences, is dead. A year of severe blockade
has engendered a confrontation between the Palestinian parties
and the Jewish wet dream of an inter-Palestinian civil war is
about to come true. The Holy Land is on the verge of collapse.
President Carter is 82, and he is not afraid of anything. At
this age, in this stage of life, statesmen are likely to speak
their mind, like the Malaysian PM Mohammad Mahathir did after
his retirement. This is the time for unpalatable truth: the
ideological and spiritual guidance of the West, dislodged from
the hands of the Church, passed over to the usurpers of Zion.
While they rule, Palestine has no chance.
Though most ordinary US
Jews are sane and sensible, these decisions are made by
super-rich, super-powerful, super-chauvinist Jews who are
anything but. They are the power pushing for war. Carter wants
to stop the disaster in the Middle East, by convincing the sane
and rebutting the arrogant. Thus the President joined the
fracas, as traditional WASP America tries to regain lost
ground and save the country they love from destruction. The
WASPs, with their immense property holdings, traditions and
roots found themselves marginalised by the Jews, with their
death grip on the media and universities: indeed, Spirit rules
over Matter. The reports by the
Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group and
Walt – Mearsheimer are the first salvos fired by this WASP
Intifada. A Jewish American columnist (a resident in Israel
writing for Israel’s
Haaretz) named Burston correctly stated that “Carter's
true intended target was the organized American Jewish
community.” Carter pointed out the main reasons for apartheid in
the Holy Land, says Burston:
* Jewish control of [the US] government: “It
would be almost politically suicidal for members of Congress to
espouse a balanced position between Israel and Palestine, to
suggest that Israel comply with international law or to speak in
defense of justice or human rights for Palestinians.”
·
Jewish control of the [US] media: “What is even
more difficult to comprehend is why the editorial pages of the
major newspapers and magazines in the United States exercise
similar self-restraint, quite contrary to private assessments
expressed quite forcefully by their correspondents in the Holy
Land.”
After Carter spoke, he was
immediately counter-attacked by organised Jewry – you couldn't
miss it! In my native Siberia, in its short and furious summer,
you can watch a swarm of gnats attack a horse, each small
bloodsucker eager for his piece of the action. After a while,
the blinded and infuriated animal rushes headlong in a mad
sprint and soon finds its death in the bottomless moors. The
Jews developed the same style of attack. It is never a single
voice arguing the case, but always a mass attack from the left
and the right, from below and above, until the attacked one is
beaten and broken and crawls away in disgrace.
Each attacker is as tiny
and irrelevant as a single gnat, but as a swarm they are
formidable. Observe them separately: Dershowitz, an advocate of
torture and of hostage killing, an apprehended
plagiarist who never was
elected to any position of authority and commands no respect,
demands to debate the president. It is indeed beyond chutzpah;
but Dershowitz is supported by other Jews in prime positions and
his ridiculous demand is seconded by both university and media
until this thieving nonentity gets equal time on a TV channel to
present “his case”. Another gnat is a
Deborah Lipstadt, a nonentity brought forth by the
Washington Post. Plenty of others are even smaller than
these two, for instance 14 Jews who gave up their positions at
Carter Center. If they were not able to keep the media in their
hands, they wouldn't be heard by anyone but their spouses.
Their technique is quite
simple: They switch the focus of argument onto the personality
of their adversary. Thus, instead of discussing apartheid in
Israel, we discuss Jimmy Carter, whether he is a bigot and
antisemite (thus Foxman, the “bad Jew”) or he is not (Avnery,
the “good Jew”). The correct answer is “irrelevant”: Carter’s
love for Jews or lack of it has no bearing on the question of
apartheid in Palestine. Likewise, if we discuss the situation in
Bosnia or Kosovo, we do not go into our sentiments towards
Serbs, Albanians or Croats. But Jews are different!
For instance, General
Wesley Clark said that rich Jews, the great donors of Washington
politicians, push for war with Iran. Well, this can be
discussed, maybe even denied, but instead they derail the
discussion into another topic, whether Clark is an antisemite.
Matthew Yglesias
provides the sources for the whole kosher hog, from
comparison with The Protocols, to the inevitable quote
from Foxman who says Clark had “bought into conspiratorial
bigotry”. From this moment, Clark will stick to defending
himself, and the guys will take care that his hands will be
full. Here again, the correct answer is a polite shrug: who
cares whether Clark is a bigot? Maybe he is also a paedophile
and usurer, but this ad hominem has no bearing on what he
said. And an accusation “you do not love Jews” is not much
different from “You do not love your aunt”, and you probably
have learned to live with it at the age of six.
A good book to accustom
oneself to this sort of attack is Michael Bulgakov’s
The Master and Margarita: this marvellous book shows the
Jewish critics’ swarm attack on a writer who dared to write
about Christ. Indeed, whoever mentions Christ will experience it
sooner or later.
I also had a personal taste
of this swarm attack. During the Tsunami disaster in Thailand I
discovered that the Jewish undertakers, Zaka, forced the Thais
to delay mass burial of victims for a day or two, despite the
real and immediate danger of epidemic diseases, in order to
avoid a real calamity: that holy Jewish bodies might be
inadvertently buried together with the goyim. I was told so by
the members of Zaka team who were quite proud of their feat. I
wrote about it (Tsunami
in Gaza). It was republished by a few sites. Then, a British
Jew named Manfred Ropschitz began an ad hominem campaign
against me. Other Jews joined the fray, discussing whether I am
a Jew, or a “Swedish-Russian Nazi antisemite”, as if this had
any bearing on the tsunami story. Instead of shrugging it off,
other supporters of Palestine switched to this piquant subject.
They carried their discussion from The Times to their email
lists, until eventually, another Jewish “antizionist” commented
with deep satisfaction: “Shamir is marginalised and brought into
disrepute”.
Ropschitz did not try to
disprove the story, for the story was true. He wrote: “With an
army of journalists crawling over the Tsunami story I'd expect
to have heard such shocking news by now – if it's true. I am a
journalist and I don't believe it.” No, gentlemen, you won’t
hear a true story if it is not acceptable to Ropschitzes of this
world. They will hunt you to the far-away corner of the world,
and there are not many people who care to risk their
well-planned attacks. Indeed, one ought to be a real kamikaze to
enter this fight. The Ropschitzes, these quite ordinary Jews
who fully identify with their community, are the key to the
swarm attack. There are many Jewish media-lords, even more
Jewish editors, but it is the Ropschitzes that clinch the party
line. These willing executioners of our freedom, these
foot-soldiers of the media lords, automatically defend “the
Jews” (i.e., the organised Jewish community) at any price.
Ordinary human beings of Jewish origin can be of any opinion.
Likewise, ordinary Americans do not decide whether their country
will attack Iran or not. But Bush and Cheney alone can’t fight
the Iraqi war, and the Jewish media lords would be powerless
without their willing executioners of freedom.
The Gentile philosemites
are even worse, observed Eustace Mullins, the legendary American
writer whose best-selling books (running into the millions) were
never published or distributed by the mainstream press. He
wrote:
“It has long been common knowledge since the incorporation of
the three [US] major national television networks that each of
them was owned, operated and controlled by Jews. Now at last, or
so it seemed, the Christians of America would have their own
Christian television network on which they could observe the
tenets of the Christian religion. Or so it seemed. And when the
CBN began its daily broadcasting, what was its daily message? We
must love the Jews. We must support the State of Israel in all
its depredations and its immoral devastation of the Holy
Christian Shrines in the Birthplace of Our Saviour. We must help
the Jews, and we must, above all, avoid the greatest sin, the
sin of 'anti-Semitism', whatever that is. Even the Jewish
networks do not broadcast as blatantly pro-Jewish propaganda as
the Christian Broadcasting Network.”
A man died this week in
France, a real saint, who was known by the affectionate
appellation of “Abbč Pierre”, a priest who fought with the
Resistance, helped the homeless, provided for the poor and was a
great friend of the Palestinians. In 1996 he was hounded almost
to death after he expressed his support for another friend of
Palestine, Roger Garaudy, who wrote a book called
The Founding Myths of Israeli Politics. A victim of Jewish
swarm attack, he went into seclusion in Italy and Switzerland,
deserted by the very people he fought for. His sorry fate should
be remembered by the French, and bother their conscience. If the
Maid of Orleans was executed by the British Occupation regime
(though using French collaborationists), no such excuse is
available for those who ostracised the Abbč Pierre: they just
got frightened by the swarm attack.
This fear of Jewish swarm
attacks has already brought much sorrow to mankind. In 1930s,
the famous American aviator Charles Lindbergh called for the US
to stay out of the approaching war in Europe. He was attacked by
the Jewish media as a Nazi and a Hitler sympathiser, was
besmirched and “overnight Lindbergh
went from cultural hero to moral pariah”. Now again, the US
is being pushed by the same forces into a new war, this time in
the Middle East. Let us try and stop it by being fearless, for
as a Jewish Hassid spiritual song hath it, “haikar lo lefahed
bihlal” -- the most important thing is not to be afraid at all.
Carter brought us hope that there is an America the world can
live with: a non-aggressive, democratic America, whose policies
aren’t decided by the rich donors, but by the ordinary Americans
who voted against the war, and who today gather in Washington
calling to stop its escalation.
|
