Russia Hesitates
– II
(follow-up of
Russia
Hesitates with readers’ responses)
By Israel Shamir
(Moscow- Tel Aviv)
Unwillingly, the
world rolls down to a next bout of war, as Israel and the US are
pushing for sanctions on Iran. Of the great powers, the UK seems
to follow orders of Washington, Germany is unable to say “no” to
Jews, while France is about to elect the most pro-American and
pro-Israel president, Nicolas Sarkozy, in its history. China is
unwilling to get involved, and is rumoured to go along as long
as sanctions do not refer to oil and gas. Russia appears to be a
lonely voice for peace in the Middle East, for reasons of its
own.
A few days ago
President Putin called Prime Minister Olmert, and enquired
whether Israel intentionally goes the way of the Crusader
Kingdom to perish and oblivion by refusing to settle with its
neighbours? Olmert was shocked: nobody dared to speak to him
like that. European and American leaders usually stood up
smartly and declared their support of Israel’s right to defend
itself. Russians were equally considerate towards Israel - since
1991, when its ambassador in Tel Aviv, a late Mr Bovin, was
frequently mistaken for an Israeli ambassador in Russia.
When Russia
began to assert itself after the catastroyka, and Russian
leaders made their first modest proposals regarding the Middle
East, Israel took it as an insult. This defeated country should
never give us advises, fumed Shimon Peres in live broadcast. But
Russia continued to gather strength, and Russians again became
active participants in the process. The recent visit of Russian
Foreign Minister Mr Lavrov to Damascus and Tel Aviv gave another
expression to it. Lavrov tried to convince Israeli leaders to
give up on Iran sanctions. Sanctioned Iran will feel isolated,
threatened and will leave the NPT. Sanctions will lead to war,
explained Lavrov, but Israeli officials did not mind the war,
they insisted on sanctions. Then, the Russians pulled out their
proposal of a new international conference for Middle East,
Madrid-2. This idea has support of Arab states, but Israel
rejected it, as well. It seems that Israel marches to war and
considers it inevitable.
This feeling of
inevitability has much to do with the US policy. Unravelling of
9/11 mystery in the US may push Bush administration to speed up
its war plans. For the first time since 2001, the mainstream US
media gave coverage to “conspiracy theories”, and revealed that
more than a third of American population believes in
Administration involvement.
Major European newspapers
followed the path. Though there are many faulty small and large
details in the official version, the main reason for public
doubt lays elsewhere: if some bad and hard Muslim terrorists
could perpetrate the 9/11 attack, why they failed to do anything
similar afterwards? Ridiculous attempts to present ‘liquid
explosives plot’ as a new 9/11 further undermined popular trust.
Bush may feel that the war with Iran is the only way to escape
trial.
There are
hard-nosed Russian experts who do not mind the forthcoming war.
In their view, America’s involvement in Iran will mirror
Russia’s own unfortunate experience in Afghanistan. If you call
Vietnam ‘bogging down’, and Iraq ‘quagmire’, you’ll have to
invent a new word for Iran. The oil price will go up to $200, -
enough to gold-plate every loo in oil-producing Russia, as Marx
prophesied. Attack on Iran will destroy America – why bother?
Why should we try and stop it, say the experts.
But Putin has
strong internal reason for trying to defuse the war, as the
Zionist plot of inflaming inter-religious conflict may undermine
Russia. The roots of the plot are to be found in the transition
period from the USSR to post-Soviet Russia, when a young and
fresh Israeli Lobby in Moscow was formed. Its members were
supporters of Market Democracy, Neo-liberalism and
Privatisation. Support for Israel was a shibboleth for deference
to the West’s wishes. While ordinary Russians regretted the
demise of the Soviet Union, Russian Jews – together with
upwardly mobile Russians - actively supported the market reforms
and cheered suppression of democratically elected Parliament in
1991 and 1993.
These pro-Market forces seized media; like in the West, Jews own
large share of media owners and editors, as well as large banks
and capitalist enterprises. Though not obsessively Zionist, they
still harbour a warm feeling for Israel. For them Israel is not
a place to escape mythic antisemitism, but a place to escape
criminal police, as so many Jewish crooks from the US, France,
England and Russia did.
Pro-Israeli
forces in Russia successfully promoted a conflict between the
Christians and the Muslims; proposing to integrate Russians into
anti-Muslim “white” front. The Jewish-owned and edited media
imported anti-Muslim discourse wholesale. Though it was quite
foreign to Russians who are used to live together with Muslim
Tatars since the dawn of their history, media succeeded to
poison minds. Chechnya was the key to this development:
generously supported by the Jewish tycoon Berezovsky, Chechen
fighters by their acts of terror enforced anti-Muslim feelings.
“Gaza is our Chechnya”, used to say Israeli emissaries, though
Chechens (as opposed to Gazans) had all civil and political
rights of Russian citizens.
In the same
time, hundreds of thousands of Chechens and other Muslim ethnic
groups migrated into northern Russian cities, where – as opposed
to Western Europe – they were economically very successful and
caused much envy among the native population. Recent riots in
Kandapoga were a result of this success. Immigration is a tricky
issue, and on the whole it is good for Zionists, whether in
Europe or in Russia. The Russian nationalists of Le Pen style
(and worse) became friends of Israel and of Zionism. They
support Israel’s fight against the Muslims, and they hope the
Jews will go away to Israel (needless to say, this pipedream is
not likely to occur with thousands of Russian Jews moving back
to prospering Russia each month). Heads of the Russian Jewish
Congress were reported to transfer large sums of money to the
more obnoxious racist groups in order to point them against the
Muslim immigrants.
Thus Putin’s
administration is gripped in a vice between pro-Western liberals
with their sympathy to Israel on the ‘left’, and on the ‘right’
by Russian ‘white’ nationalists who object to influx of Muslim
immigrants and support rabidly anti-Muslim Tel Aviv. This vice
endangers cohesiveness of the country, as not only North
Caucasus, but Tatarstan may break away. As opposed to Europe,
Russia has not only Muslim immigrants, but a prominent native
Muslim minority. Preservation of Russia depends on defeating
this anti-Muslim trend, for otherwise, the country will be
devastated and broken into warring fiefs. Thus Putin’s Russia
opposes the Conflict of Civilisations’ paradigm.
But will it
suffice? The Jews, that is organised Jewry and the Jewish state,
are definitely keen on promoting war between Christians and
Muslims. Their powerful media gave us recently the Satanic
Pictures and cared to deliver them to each Muslim. Now they gave
great publicity to the Pope speech, while pro-Zionist Pakistan
delivered the Muslim opinion. This is not the first direct
involvement of Pakistan’s ruler in promotion of the Zionist
plans: a few weeks ago Pakistani Secret services provided
support for the “liquid explosives plot”,
totally discredited
since then. (No less an authority than Lieutenant-Colonel (ret.)
Nigel Wylde, a former senior British Army Intelligence Officer,
who was awarded the Queen's Gallantry Medal for his command of
the Belfast Explosive Ordnance Disposal Unit, has suggested that
the police and government story about the "terror plot" was part
of a “pattern of lies and deceit.”)
Nor are they
satisfied with media coverage: Amira Haas, the courageous
Haaretz reporter in the West Bank, indirectly accused (in
Haaretz September 20, 2006) Israeli Secret Services of an attack
and arson of churches in Nablus, Tubas and other Palestinian
cities. Our American correspondent Tom Mysiewicz wrote: “This is
obviously just another effort to create a war of mutual
extermination between the Christian and Islamic worlds.” While
our French friend Xavier Lavaud explained: “The goal of Zionists
was to obscure the recent condemnation of Christian Zionists by
the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem. They chose a sentence of the
Pope out of context.” While regretting the Pope’s comment, we
should spend more effort in trying to defuse this situation than
in blaming the head of the Catholic Church beset as he is by the
enemies of the Church and of Christ. The war can be stopped, but
it calls for our strong and concerted effort.
From Charles Johnston
I really enjoyed your recent
article on your website on Russia, you are right as Limonov
said, the fall of Russia would lead to rampant U.S.
interventions in the world. I do wish the left would come to
power again, but that is wishful thinking I guess. Maybe Putin
could learn from uncle Joe Stalin how to bring Russia to a
world power again. I never thought I would wish for a return
in one form or another, the Soviet Union. That is of course
what our ruling class is worried about partially, the return
of Russia possibly a Soviet one. If the Soviet Union was still
around, Iraqi children would not be butchered by American
power. It amazes me, that we commemorate the deaths yesterday,
of those who died on 9-11,but say nothing of Iraqi or Afghani
deaths. It is hypocrisy.
I used to think my country was
one of the good guys, but like the criticisms you have of your
country, my country falls way short of the "good guys".
Comment from The Brave New
World mail-list, Thailand: My God! Is absolutely
nothing sacred? First these shamireaders
communicants have the downright effrontery to suggest Israel,
with help from across the Atlantic, was just a tiny bit
naughty in virtually blasting Lebanon off the ME map. Now
they're suggesting that Russia (you know: as the USSR, the
Evil Empire of the Cold War Era) might play a valuable part in
stopping the US - Iran disagreement going ballistic. Even
worse! They make it sound plausible. [Tho' of
course, you have to take in where Shamir's writing from: also
the fact he's pushing, trying to persuade in favour of a
Russian initiative. I doubt if the Chechens would 100% go
along with what he has to say in respect of themselves. And
China isn't precisely the shining white knight where human
rights is concerned - ask the Uigers and the imprisoned
dissidents! But then again... Hasn't Europe played its
disgraceful part in the US rendition saga, as we see is now
coming more fully into the light? So where, as a Jeffersonian-type
democrat - as a democrat of any description - do you take your
stand strategically? Perhaps somewhere near the ground Shamir
is on, where your enemy's enemy is (temporarily at least) your
friend. And never mind all the blood they've got on their
hands].
Anyway, as usual, a riveting,
mind-opening read from these amazing iconoclasts.
From Peter Kirsch MD
Shalom rav.
A brilliant article! Thank you!
Possibly you could advise on how
to contact Vladimir Putin (whom I have always admired) in
order to congratulate him on his handling of Khordokovsky and
the other Jews who bought Russia from Yeltsin.
From Dr Courban, Beirut
Russia is allied to Syria and
Iran. I am not particularly in love with the friends of my
Russian Orthodox brothers. I consider the Syrian regime as
well as the Iranian one as enemies to the very existence of
Lebanon as well as a danger to the Levantine cosmopolitism.
Bilad al Sham is a wonderful idea
of course. But Bilad al Sham has nothing to do with Persia. I
published in the Lebanese L'Orient-Le Jour, about the revenge
of Darius III, on june 10th 2006. I predicted this last war.
My article is on the Internet now, even in english, on the
following web site:
http://www.democracyinlebanon.org/DemLebForum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=131 Bilad
al Sham as a partner to Europe, yes. Bilad al Sham as a new
version of the ex-Soviet empire in an Orthodox habillage, no.
Yes to the Levant, as I see it as
an heir to the Seleucides, Byzantines, Omeyyades, Ottomans. I
don't think we have anything to do with the "Sassanids", the "Sefevids"
etc.... Probably, we are not talking about the same Levant
dear Shamir.
Yours
Antoine
From Nidal Abed
People predicted that Russia
might do some ting to stop the war on Iraq who was closer to
the Russian ideologies than Iran, and who did not posses any
WMD.. Russia did not do anything although it was clear that
She is going to lose a strategic ally in a very important
region, and all the Iraqi debt to Russia is going to be
written off.
I personally don't count on
Russia much.
From Ronald Knarr
Thank you. A very informative
article.
From Tom Mysiewicz
I listen to the Voice of Russia
almost daily. They seem to waffle a bit--they're chess
players. Lately they've been looking like they might "roll
over" on the Iranian nuclear project. We shall see. A good
thing Putin has done is to offer substantial relocation
bonuses for Russian speakers who wish to return to Russia.
Many of the non-Jews (and even Jews) who emigrated to Israel
during the Reagan era might like to take advantage of that
program!
Forwarded by Peter Myers:
Putin the Great and the rebirth of Russia
Putin Protecting The People From
Rothschild Zionist And The NWO
http://agitpapa.newsvine.com/_news/2006/03/09/123197-putin-the-great--and-the-rebirth-of-russia#master
|