The Dangerous
Liaisons
By Israel Shamir
THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE JEWISH POST-WAR
ASCENDANCY?
The people of France have sent an important message to
the world, by electing the traditionalist leader,
Jean-Mari le Pen to the second round of the French
presidential elections. It was not just a proof of
general dissatisfaction, as NY Times claimed. The first
round occurred while the Jewish troops besieged the
Church of Nativity, starved nuns, shot priests, and
despoiled the land of Christ. Israeli bulldozers worked
around the clock covering mass graves of their innocent
victims in the Jenin refugee camp, Jewish soldiers
destroyed churches and mosques in Nablus, shot at the
Holy Virgin in Bethlehem, while one hundred fifty
thousand Jews marched in Paris and elsewhere, supporting
the genocide in Palestine. Waving Israeli flags and
draped in the blue and white colours of their national
banner (the tricolour is dropped and forgotten), the
Jews marched from the Place de la République to the
Place de la Bastille in Paris, chanting in French and
Hebrew and carrying signs that read "Yesterday New York,
today Jerusalem, tomorrow Paris.”
Today’s Jerusalem is an unhappy city, its non-Jewish
majority dispossessed, uprooted, pushed into ghetto and
controlled by brutal Jewish Border Police. Today’s
Jerusalem has the most advanced torture facilities, and
there, thousands of kidnapped Palestinians are subjected
to electric chocks, beating and humiliation. Today’s
Jerusalem is a place where only Jews can move freely and
enjoy the fruits of civilisation. Should it be a model
for tomorrow’s Paris? Mais non, the people of France had
experienced the German Nazi conquest in 1940s, and they
did not want to try the Judeo-Nazi occupation.
That was the main message sent by the French voter. We
should thank General Sharon’s brutality and
ill-conceived solidarity of Jews in France with the
génocidaire for this result. Until now, the Jews were
divided in their tasks and purposes. In Palestine, they
created a toxic, ferociously nationalist and religiously
fanatic entity based on Hitler’s Nuremberg Laws.
Elsewhere, in France as well as in Britain, they
promoted the pseudo-liberal paradigm of dismantling
European national and cultural content in favour of the
Judeo-American spirit. In Palestine, they shot at the
church; in France, they undermined it by subterfuge. One
law for themselves: extreme right wing nationalism of
Sharon. Another law for the goyiim: liberal New Labour
of Tony Blair.
If the Jews would have sense, they would keep the inner
dialectical unity of their pincer-movement attack as
their best guarded secret. But they were inebriated by
their successes. The spiritual teacher of Sephardic
Jews, Rabbi Obadiah Joseph, ruled that Jews should not
show their ascendancy in the world until they would be
able to destroy the Christian Churches in the Holy Land.
Now, with the Nativity besieged, they apparently felt
the condition is fulfilled. Jews became united to an
extent unknown since the days of Christ, and united by a
common will, single purpose and a feeling of arriving to
the pinnacle of power. Intoxication of power and unity
caused the usually cautious people to drop masks, to
leave pretences. It seems the Jews call out ‘Kill him’,
as two thousand years ago. This new openness provided us
with a previously unheard-of insight into the soul of
the Jews and their supporters.
An authentic Jewish voice, Ron Grossman of Chicago
Tribune wrote, “As a self-proclaimed humanist, I ought
to recoil in horror from the thought of tanks rumbling
through a city, anybody's city. My head should hang in
sorrow at televised images of street fighting (rather,
massacres - ISH) in Bethlehem and Ramallah. But here is
a hint: Don't lecture or preach to us. Forget about
appealing to our better selves”.
Please note this plural ‘us’ before denying the obvious.
The Jews do not hide anymore behind the useful but dated
device of “Americans, French or British citizens of
Jewish faith”. It is again The Jews, a single body with
a single mind. Forget about appealing to their better
selves, as they have not got any. ‘The better selves’
were just a device.
“No one can express the aspirations of most Israelis
like the prime minister. This is not a war that was
waged by Sharon, the "warmonger," this is the war of all
of us”, reports Gideon Levy, a man of heart and
conscience, who was recently banned from the pages of
the ‘liberal’ Haaretz. (I was banned ten years ago.
Welcome to the club, Gideon!) “It will also be very
difficult to blame Sharon for the consequences of the
war, in the light of the sweeping support he has been
given by the majority of Israelis. Nearly 30,000 men
were mobilized and they reported for duty as one man,
making the refusal movement, with 21 refuseniks
currently in jail, irrelevant”.
The Jews abroad were just as awful as those in
Palestine. Professor David D. Perlmutter wrote in LA
Times : “I daydream--if only! If in 1948, 1956, 1967 or
1973 Israel had acted just a bit like the Third Reich,
then today Israelis would shop, eat pizza, marry and
celebrate the holy days unmolested. And of course Jews,
not sheiks, would have that Gulf oil’. Witty if snobbish
Taki of the British weekly Spectator contributed the
following anecdotal evidence of the new Jewish vehemence
and single-mindedness: “On Easter Sunday, during lunch,
the richest woman in Israel, Irit Lando , suddenly burst
into my house and began to harangue my friends and
family about Adam Shapiro. Despite the fact she's one of
my wife's oldest friends and was invited to drop in
after lunch, I was extremely annoyed. I reminded Irit
that my house was not Israeli occupied territory; that
it was Easter; and knowing how I feel about the plight
of the Palestinians, she should change the subject.
Which she did, turning on the press, instead, and how
they gave publicity to that godawful traitor Adam
Shapiro”.
As few mavericks of Jewish origin like Adam Shapiro or
marvellous Jennifer Loewenstein became increasingly
marginalized, the Jews en masse rally to support Sharon
and Israel. From Moscow to Brooklyn, from Marseille to
Hampstead, the Jews speak in one voice. WE ARE ONE,
proclaimed the headline of the Jewish Week. This vision
of united, ready for the kill, Jewry could not but scare
the French voter, and any thinking man. Le Pen was
probably the only French politician totally opposed by
the Jews.
The French and the West European Left should learn the
lesson before it is too late. Their liaison with the
Jews became a liability and a source of embarrassment.
Historically it was probably justified, but not any
more. Even the Jewish stranglehold on media can not
deliver the electoral goods. Instead of supporting
Jewish agenda, the Left should compete with the Right by
addressing problems of working class in the country and
of the income disparity on the global scale. There
should be no more immigration, and this task calls to
stop the main creator of immigration, the unfair
Judeo-American globalisation and Bush and Blair’s War
against Islam. In the forthcoming May elections in the
UK, the Left should give the boot to Michael Levy’s
protégé Tony Blair, and turn to the tradition of Michael
Foot.
The electoral success of Le Pen could signify the
beginning of the end of the Jewish post-war ascendancy.
Inverting the slogan of French Jews, we say, Yesterday
Paris, Today Washington, and Tomorrow Jerusalem.
P.S. My commentary on Le Pen’s electoral success in the
first round of the French presidential elections caused
many responses, from exuberant “Yes, man. I agree with
every word” of Gilad Atzmon, the Israeli musician and
writer, to surly “Take me off your list. I'm seeking to
have you banned from al-awda-unity” of the good Jewish
American supporter of Palestinians, Stanley Heller. The
discourse went by two distinct routes, one, referring to
Le Pen, his policies and circumstances, including the
question of immigration; two, is the usual ‘fight
against anti-Semitism’ of our Jewish friends. I hesitate
to enter another debate of anti-Semitism. After Jenin
massacre, during the vicious siege of the Church of
Nativity, I am not sure we should give much
consideration to fine feelings of our Jewish friends.
Hundred years ago, a similar discussion went on between
the Russian Bolsheviks (of Jewish or any other origin)
and the Jewish Bundists. Bund guys felt the Jewish
people are too special to get the general treatment.
Years and aeons passed, but good people like Stanley
(and I like and appreciate him and his work for the
cause) do not succeed to get out of Bund mould. My good
friend Miriam wondered, why I should annoy people by
speaking of ‘Jewish’ soldiers, snipers etc instead of
the ‘Israeli’ ones. Dear Miriam, Israel means Jews. That
is the meaning of the word. The State of Israel means
the state of Jews. Beside semantics, there are none but
us Jews in power of Israel. Enough of this small game of
distinction between Israel and Jews, as we witness mass
unlimited support of Jews for Israel.
If our Jewish friends’ feelings are hurt, they are now
in the same boat with the Muslims, terrorists to a man,
with the Germans, willing executioners of You-Know-Who,
with Europeans (White Supremacists) and the rest of
mankind. This demand of a special treatment for the Jews
is a source of Jewish neurosis. Why a Jewish Week may
write, “We (the Jews) Are One”, but I may not repeat:
“the Jews are unified to an incredible extent”? Isn’t it
a case of having a cake and eating it, proclaiming unity
within and forbidding the outsiders to see it?
Stanley objects to an ‘old canard’ of Jews as enemies of
Christ. We live in the strange days when old canards
became true. Jews besiege the Church of Nativity, and
probably will destroy it soon – is it an “old canard” or
reality? Hundreds of children are murdered in Palestine
– is it an “old canard” or reality? Senate and Congress
of the US kowtow to the Jews – is it an “old canard” or
reality? Stan is sure that the Americans will forever
stand by the Jews, right or wrong. Well, the success of
Le Pen should teach him that it can change.
He thinks that Le Pen won the hearts of French voters by
his anti-Muslim views. How come, then, that Le Pen was
tried twice for his “anti-Semitic” remarks, and never –
for the anti-Muslim ones? I am not alone in my opinion:
Naomi Klein of No Logo wrote: The hatred of Jews is a
potent political tool in the hands of the right in
Europe and in Israel. For Mr. Le Pen, anti-Semitism is a
windfall, helping spike his support from 10 per cent to
17 per cent in a week.
Some readers misunderstood me and thought I support Le
Pen. Surely I do not: Le Pen is a bad guy in my books,
but bad guys will be called to undo the excessive Jewish
power if the good guys fail to do it.
___________________
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/perspective/chi-0204070422apr07.s
April 7, 2002
I normalised the spelling of her name. Taki the snob had
to spell quite an ordinary Jewish name Landoi (var.
Landau) in the French way.
