In Berlin, the high
and mighty including U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, German
President Johannes Rau and Israel's president, Moshe Katsav gathered
for a Conference of the Organization for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OSCE) dedicated to the struggle against anti-Semitism.
They proclaimed that “the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is serving as
a cover for worldwide anti-Semitic sentiment” as Ha'aretz
reported today. I was not invited to this gathering, but if I were,
I would present them with the following talk.
Children
of a Lesser God
By
Israel Shamir
Kinder eines unbedeutenderen Gottes
Enfants d’un Dieu Subalterne
Hijos de un Dios menor |
Your Excellencies, this conference is indeed an extremely
important, historic event, to be compared with Constantine’s
Edict of Milan or with Nicene Council of the Church. I am
not sure that all of you fully understand what you did, what
is the meaning of the code-words ‘Struggle against
anti-Semitism’.
|
|
|
You
accepted your second-class status of children of lesser
god, when you tried publishers of Norman Finkelstein's
Holocaust Industry and allowed agents of ADL to march
streets of Berlin with Israeli flags and portraits of
Bomber Harris. You agreed that your blood is cheap. Do
not be surprised if it will flow after the supply of
Palestinians will dry up.
|
|
|
Let us say
first what it is NOT. Your ‘struggle against anti-Semitism’ is not a
defence for a persecuted small nation; if it were, you would defend
the besieged Palestinians. It is not a struggle against racism, for
you support racist apartheid in Palestine. It is not a struggle
against anti-Jewish discrimination, for there is none, and from
Moscow to Paris to New York, Jews occupy the very pinnacle of power.
It is not
defence of Jewish life, for the only Jew wounded of late in Europe
cut himself with his own kitchen knife in an attempt to incriminate
a Muslim. It is not defence of Jewish property, for Jews are the
only people on earth who have regained every piece of property their
ancestors ever claimed from Berlin to Baghdad. Your ‘struggle
against anti-Semitism’ has nothing to do with long-dead historic
anti-Semitism, anti-Jewish racial theory. There are Semites and
descendents of Jews on both sides of the battle.
TOP
|
Your ‘struggle against anti-Semitism’, theological in
concept, relates to the centuries-old dilemma: “Are all
people born equal, equally important and equally close to
God? Or are Jews a cut above, special in God's eyes,
designating the rest of humanity as the children of a lesser
God?” The first alternative was affirmed by St Paul. The
second choice was the banner of Caiaphas. St Paul was
‘antisemite’ in eyes of Caiaphas for he denied Jewish
superiority.
Today,
Excellencies, you made your choice, and as Pontius Pilate in
his time, you preferred to stand by Caiaphas. It does not
matter that the Palestinians are being immured alive behind
the 25-foot concrete wall; that the olive groves are erased
and wells demolished; what is important that “Israel or its
leaders should not be demonized or villainized” in words of
your colleague Colin Powell. It is not a question of policy
anymore, but of theology, for belief in Jewish superiority
is the official faith of Pax Americana, like Christianity
was that of the Roman Empire in the days of Constantine the
Great. To stress the point, you forbade using Nazi symbols
in conjecture with Israeli policies, but allowed
superimposing Swastika of Hitler onto the Cross of Christ.
TOP |
|
It does not matter that the Palestinians are being immured
alive behind the 25-foot concrete wall; that the olive
groves are erased and wells demolished; what is important
that "Israel or its leaders should not be demonized or
vilified".
|
DOUBLE STANDARDS
|
|
You forbade using Nazi symbols in conjecture with Israeli
policies, but allowed superimposing Swastika of Hitler onto
the Cross of Christ.
|
|
You submitted
to the new religion brought over to Europe from across the ocean,
with American tanks and dollars and movies, to the neo-Judaic
religion of a Chosen few, of man-made landscapes, of economic
freedom; of alienation and uprooting, of denying solidarity and
sacrality to non-Chosen. You proclaimed today that the Judaic ideas
and values are the foundations of the New World Order you are
committed to uphold rather than the Christian ideal of solidarity
and equality. You brought Europe back into Arian heresy defeated at
Nicaea, and demeaned Christ. Your excessive and abnormal care for
the wellbeing of Jews is a symbol of your submission.
Probably you
consider yourselves ‘realists and pragmatists’ who care little for
this religious mumbo-jumbo. If you were realists and pragmatists,
you would consider what this acceptance of Jewish superiority means
for YOU, if you do not care for Palestinians or Iraqis. I open the
Jerusalem Post of 22.04.04, and read the words of your new
superiors:
“My problem
is not only with Germany. It is with everything German, anywhere. I
neither argue nor get upset. I have simply wiped Germany and its
people off my globe”, - writes Matti Golan, the former
editor-in-chief of the leading Israeli newspaper Haaretz and of the
Globes, the paper for the Jewish economic elites. Matti Golan is not
a firebrand; he is not one of Jewish religious fanatics who deny
goyim even descent from Adam. Indeed, I could fill hundreds of pages
with similar – and worse – quotes from Khabbad books or Cabbala
wizards. But Golan is not a Cabbalist and extremist but one of the
sane, non-religious mainstream influential Jewish intellectuals.
When this article was discussed on
IsraelForum.com in the internet, a
typical Jewish response was this: “Matti Golan is a prominent
journalist and columnist. He represents ideas held by the vast
majority of Israeli Jews in this subject. My opinion included.” If I
were a German, I would have second thoughts before providing Matti
Golan’s country with nuclear-capable submarines lest he will ‘simply
wipe Germany and its people off our globe’.
TOP
|
Rau: "Anti-Semitism is behind criticism of the Israeli
government's politics over the last decades"
|
|
In my view, Golan
sounded a call for racist hatred and genocide. You could
discuss it; but you would rather condemn Mahathir, or a
peace activist who fights for equality in Palestine. Your
colleague German President Johannes Rau said: “Everyone
knows that massive anti-Semitism is behind criticism of the
Israeli government's politics over the last decades”. He
said it a week after a four-year-old Asma suffocated of
Israeli tear gas inside her room in Gaza on 23.04.04, a year
after Rachel Corrie was crushed by Israeli bulldozer. Thus,
whoever says ‘antisemitism’ agrees with murder of Asma and
Rachel. |
|
You cause
contempt, and it is dangerous for you. In a mass-circulation Israeli
daily Maariv (24.04.04), Dan Margalit, a superstar of Israeli
journalism, writes of the man who tried to warn you of the grave
danger of Israeli nuclear potential:
“Vanunu posed
himself as suffering Mel Gibson, a new Jesus, who suffers in jail
for his conversion to Christianity. I must admit he was
discriminated on the religious grounds, but positively
discriminated. Vanunu remained alive for his treason, spying and
baptism notwithstanding, Israel treated him as a Jew. Everyone knows
what the Israeli Mossad would do to him if he were a German nuclear
technician on a service of an Arab state - The names of those sorts
are carved on gravestones in the cemeteries of Europe.” (Do not look
for this sentence on the Maariv English-language website: it is
sanitised.)
Its message is
clear: blood of a goy, especially of a German goy, is of less value
than blood of a Jew. And you brought it upon yourselves.
TOP
Israel boasted
that her assassins murdered German technicians and scientists – but
Germany never complained. A brave and noble American Jew, John Sack,
published a book on Jewish atrocities committed against innocent
ethnic Germans in late 1940s – but Germany did not investigate the
grave accusations, did not demand the trial of the criminals; even
the book of Sack was not published in Germany. Jews admitted mass
poisoning of German POWs and an attempt to murder millions of German
civilians – Germany did not investigate it, but transferred more
money and military hardware to Israel.
You accepted
your second-class status of children of lesser god. Not today – when
you elevated Auschwitz and disdained the fiery holocaust of Dresden.
When you bewept deportations of Jews and ignored deportations of
ethnic Germans by Zionist-ridden governments of Poland and
Czechoslovakia. When you pushed for disarmament of Iraq and supplied
nuclear equipment to Dimona. When you locked up and extradited
Palestinian fighters and did not demand extradition of an Israeli
citizen Solomon Morel who tortured and killed thousands of Germans.
When you tried publishers of Norman Finkelstein’s Holocaust Industry
and allowed agents of ADL to march streets of Berlin with Israeli
flags and portraits of Bomber Harris. You agreed that your blood is
cheap. Do not be surprised if it will flow after the supply of
Palestinians will dry up.
Personally, I
am rather grateful for what you did. Until now, the struggle for
equality in Palestine was hindered by well-meaning women and men who
did not question the Jewish supremacy in Europe and the US but were
horrified by the genocide of Palestinians. While fighting against
the Wall, or against devastation of Gaza, they were worried by
accusation of ‘anti-Semitism’. They thought the argument against
Israeli apartheid is legitimate in the New World Order. Now you have
removed this obstacle by proving that whatever happens in Palestine
is not a local aberration but the foundation stone of Pax Americana.
TOP
Let them both fall together:
the local and the global scheme of Judaic supremacy, so Jews and
Gentiles will be able once again live like equals in Palestine and
elsewhere.
Israel Shamir, Jaffa
www.israelshamir.net
info@israelshamir.net
The new religion
brought over to Europe from across the ocean, with American tanks
and dollars and movies, the neo-Judaic religion of a Chosen few, of
man-made landscapes, of economic freedom; of alienation and
uprooting, of denying solidarity and sacrality to non-Chosen. The
Judaic ideas and values are the foundations of the New World Order.
1) Miriam Reik to Powell
Sir:
I read with interest about your trip to Berlin to discuss racism
against Jews. Of course, it made me remember that, some years ago,
you refused to travel to South Africa to discuss racism against
other folks, like Blacks. It certainly made me scratch my head.
I seem to have a different fix on these things
than our government does. I think that the real problem these days
is not anti-Semitism but philo-semitism. If we were not so darned
attached to the Israelis, in particular, we would obviously not be
in Iraq now, which we know has nothing to do with WMD, or 9-11, or
even President Bush's feelings about his dad. It has to do with the
fact that Israel has long wished for the destruction of the country
(at least after Egypt had been neutralized) that poses the greatest
geopolitical challenge to it. It's nice to do favors for friends
and allies, of course, but all that blood and treasure--that was
taking it a bit far.
If we didn't have such a bad case of philo-Semitism,
too, we wouldn't tolerate having our reputation irremediably ruined
as a democratic country that cares about international law by
continuing to support Israeli ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.
It's true, of course, we tolerated the ethnic cleansing of the
Tutsis by the Hutus, who aren't even remotely Jewish, but the
situations aren't comparable. The whole world ignored that carnage
whereas most of the world understands that the Palestinians have
been royally betrayed and international law sabotaged by US support
of Israeli colonialism. Moreover, when we let the Tutsis hang in
the wind, we didn't alienate 1.3 billion other Tutsis throughout the
world, whereas we have certainly alienated 1.3 billion Muslims--the
guys with the oil--with our support of Israel. This is in our
national interest? I think not--I think our infatuation with Israel
has made us leave our senses.
No doubt, Mr. Secretary, by now you are thinking
that I am one of those people who you went to Berlin to talk
about--but I'm not. I'm a Jew who has learned the true lesson of
the Holocaust (which my parents narrowly escaped), which is that
thinking that any people is superior and is therefore above
international law is the ultimate foreign policy sin because it is
an idea that will come back to bite us. I think our administration
thinks that about the Israelis and that is why it tolerates Jim Crow
in Jerusalem whereas it (and certainly you) would be horrified by it
in Washington. Please, Sir, remember where you come from when
wearing your diplomatic uniform.
Miriam M. Reik, PhD
New York, NY TOP
--------------------
From: Elias Davidsson
to: Mr. Ambassador
German Embassy in Iceland
Reykjavík
Your Excellency, Mr. Ambassador,
I just read remarks by the German President during a Conference held
in Berlin under the auspices of OSCE dedicated to the theme of
antisemitism. I wish to express some of my concerns regarding his
position and that of the German government towards the subject in
question.
My late parents were German Jews who were forced to leave Germany
under the
Nazis. I was born and brought up in Palestine, a part of which
became Israel. I settled in Iceland in 1962 where I have been living
since. The theme of the conference is therefore a subject I am very
familiar with and concerns me and my family in Israel.
Having said that, I wish to share with you my concern about the
focus on antisemism as a specific form of racism. The very term is
misleading in that most Jews are not semites in any sense while
semitic peoples include Arabs, Ethiopians and others. International
legal instruments do not distinguish - rightly so - between the
various types of racism. The very term "racism" is understood as
extending to any impermissible distinction based on race, colour,
ethnicity, nationality etc. Furthermore there exists no particular
urgency in dealing with anti-Jewish sentiment. Far more Turks and
Arabs have been mistreated and even killed in recent years for
racist motives in Europe and by Europeans than Jews. Jews occupy a
privileged position in European political, economic and cultural
life, far exceeding their proportion in society. It is a joke to
read that the most privileged community in Europe (and the United
States) laments about being persecuted. Nothing can better reinforce
the myth of the Protocols of the Wise of Zion than observing
European governments bowing to pressure by Jewish leaders in this
respect.
Furthermore, I wish to point out that Jewish communities have
themselves contributed to the perception that Jews and Zionism is
one and the same. They do so by showing more loyalty to Israel than
to any other subject of social or national concern, whether
universal human rights, European political integration, or the fight
against world hunger. There is nothing wrong with attributing to
Jewish communities some blame for the unlawful and criminal Israeli
policies against the Palestinians. This does not mean, obviously,
that Jews, or anyone else, should be discriminated against, let
alone physically abused. Criminal law is, however, fully adequate to
deal with attacks on persons, Jews or others, for whatever motive
such attacks are carried out. Equating Israeli policies with those
of the Nazis is hardly a sign of anti-Jewish feeling. On the
contrary, many Jews who oppose Israeli policies, have actually made
this equivalence in order to highlight the brutality and racism of
Israeli policies. Among them is the great German poet Erich Fried.
The equivalence is also made by Israeli fascists who actually and
consciously emulate Nazi methods they read about and brag about it.
TOP
Finally, I wish to point out that the most grievous form of racism
is racial discrimination. Jews in Europe enjoy full freedoms, of
religion, expression, association and others. Thanks to the
principles of Enlightment, Jews are no more discriminated in Europe.
No European state pursues policies of racial discrimination. On the
other hand the State of Israel not only pursues blatant policies of
racial discrimination (as defined in international human rights
treaties) but is actually based on the concept of racial
discrimination. You may not know that on the eve of the
establishment of the Jewish State in 14 May 1948, a meeting was held
by the future leadership of the State, led by David Ben Gurion, to
prepare the Declaration of the Establishment of the incumbent state.
At that meeting the representative of the then Communist Party
(Maki) proposed that the new state be declared a "sovereign and
independent" state. This proposition was defeated as it would have
implied equal rights for all inhabitants of the state, including
non-Jews (Arabs). Instead the majority adopted the definition of
Israel as "the Jewish state in Palestine" representing the world's
Jews (essentially defined biologically and extra-territorially). The
definition of Israel as a Jewish state pervades most Basic Laws of
the state, though the mechanism of discrimination is garbed in a
veil, so as not to draw too much attention of the Western world. The
details of the mechanism, including the citation of the Protocol of
the meeting I mentioned above, are found in the seminal work by
Israeli scholar Dr. Uri Davis (Israel, an Apartheid State, Zed
Books, London). The Jewish state continues to discriminate, legally,
against all non-Jews, with some categories of non-Jews subjected to
harsher discrimination than others. The most discriminated category
are the Palestinian refugees, living either in Israel proper, in the
occupied territories or outside these areas, who have been
dispossessed and rendered stateless by the Jewish state.
I urge the German government to act against all forms of racism,
stop giving VIP treatment to a particular form of racism, and
denounce the racist policies and nature of the State of Israel,
which lies at the root of the lethal conflict in the Middle East. By
doing so, the German government would demonstrate its true
compassion for both Jews and Arabs.
I am to your disposal for any further clarifications, if needed.
Sincerely yours,
Elias DAVIDSSON
Composer and expert in international law
TOP