Shock Therapy Comes to America
Unpartitioning the Problem
by Joachim Martillo (ThorsProvoni@aol.com)
The crises of Palestine, Iran, Iraq-Afghanistan-Pakistan,
and international finance are all interconnected by Zionism.
Shock Doctrine, Naomi Klein discusses the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina
as an example of the application of Friedmanite shock therapy within the USA.
The Israel Lobby and American Society, I point out
Neocons and Judonia in general incited hysteria after 9/11 to
create an exacerbation of the temporary shock and trauma in order to
facilitate changes in the US legal system and tax code, but the Neocons
following Strauss's political philosophy[lxxi]
sought and still seek a permanent remake of American and American (and American
Jewish) society to create a new shared moral and political perception that would
embrace Israel and exclude Arabs, Muslims, and any critics of Israel with the
fervor of Hagee's Christian Zionism and with the strength of moral conviction
that possessed Israel in the first decades of its existence.
Such an America would have the strength to defend itself from
Arab and Islamic infiltration in the form of Arab and Muslim American citizens
just as Israel did right after the "War of Independence" when the Israeli Army
shot a lot of desperately poor and unarmed Arabs as infiltrators for trying to
return to reclaim their property, to tend their flocks, or to harvest their
The Paulson $700 billion bailout for Wall Street is probably
the most radical application of Friedmanite shock therapy ever proposed. In
essence Paulson tried to scare or to steamroll Congress into accepting
a blueprint not to solve the financial crisis but to solidify the gains that a
tiny disproportionately Jewish Zionist hyper-wealthy class has made from looting
of the US economy since 9/11 while ordinary American tax payers would absorb all
the losses associated with the collapse of the housing bubble.
Not only has there been a total absence of public discussion
of the Zionist roots of the finance crisis, but disproportionately Jewish media
professionals have also imposed an almost total blackout of discussion of
Zionist manipulation of the US economy, which can fairly easily be traced back
to the 1950s.
The censorship of the story is understandable. Anti-Semites
made a really big deal of the Jewish aspect of the Long Depression that started
in 1873 and of the Jewish involvement in causing the Great Depression that
started with the Great Crash. Despite little forthright discussion of the issue
in economic history texts, in both cases the Jewish component of both economic
disasters was definitely present albeit quite minor -- Galbraith correctly notes
that Goldman Sachs triggered (but did not cause) the Great Crash even if he
never discusses the ethnic aspects of the US finance industry of the 20s.
Unfortunately, the lack of open discussion of the Jewish
Zionist elements of the current US financial crisis makes understanding the real
problems far more difficult than necessary.
In the run-up to the invasion to Iraq, Jewish Zionist Neocons
were spreading the message of a coming boom from privatization of Iraqi state
assets while the US government manipulated by Neocons created a homeland
security boom by talking up the threat of terrorism. Klein discusses the
homeland security industry in The Shock Doctrine but fails to
cover the disproportionate Israeli government and Jewish Zionist investment in
Because of the no-bid nature of important US government
homeland security contracts, the beneficiaries of the US government homeland
security largess have to a large extent belonged to a relatively closed club of
politically connected extremely wealthy Jabotinskian Neocon or Friedmanite
Neoliberal investors, but anyone networking through
Aish haTorah and similar Jewish Zionist groups learned in 2003 that there
were other less exclusive potentially more lucrative places and markets in which
one might participate as a commission earning deal-maker or put (very often
someone else's) investment money.
Even though the subprime mortgage market had already begun to
show signs of collapse in early September 2001, it had the potential to provide
far greater returns to a much greater range of investors and market participants
(e.g., brokers and other finance professionals) than homeland security ever had
the history of Zionist real estate investment in the Palestinian occupied
territories had already shown. Starting with the early phase of the Iraq
occupation when privatization of Iraqi assets with concomitant US economic
boom looked likely, a huge amount of highly leveraged institutional money was
moved into subprime mortgages.
Now that the subprime collapse has taken place, analysts
refusing to address the Jewish Zionist component of the US financial collapse
are taking part in a conscious or unconscious effort to create a false partition
of the problem of Zionism into separate crises
regional warfare in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan,
nuclear technology development, and
One Economic Crisis or Two? and
Israel's Cost to the World for more information.)
The refusal to address the real problem makes each of the
separate crises far more intractable and possibly even unsolvable.
I point out the following in
Holy Land Foundation (Re)trial: A Decent Respect, Part III.
There used to be an argument that anti-terrorism laws applied
only in the case of non-state terrorist groups, but Congress is in the process
of recommending in Sec. 2 Findings of S.970 Iran Counter-Proliferation Act of
2007 (Introduced in Senate):
(8) The Secretary of State should designate the Iranian
Revolutionary Guards as a Foreign Terrorist Organization under section 219 of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189) and the Secretary of the
Treasury should place the Iranian Revolutionary Guards on the list of Specially
Designated Global Terrorists under Executive Order 13224 (66 Fed. Reg. 186;
relating to blocking property and prohibiting transactions with persons who
commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism).
By any objective standard the IDF is much more a terrorist
organization than the IRG. If Iran is a terrorist state, Israel is much more so,
and anti-terrorism laws are being enforced unequally between Jews and non-Jews.
The [Holy Land Foundation] defendants' attorneys should be
able to make a case either for striking down the anti-terrorism laws entirely or
for forcing the US government to prosecute Israel-supporters, Israel advocacy
organizations, and pro-Israel groups within the organized Jewish community for
giving material aid to terrorism.
If a prosecutor refrains from prosecuting Jewish terrorism
supporters because of his own support for Zionism or for Jewish tribalism, he
may himself be guilty of a prosecutable infraction like obstruction of justice.
Such a government prosecutor should at the very least be dismissed from
Under the laws that the Bush administration has carefully
crafted, the 500 wealthiest Jewish Zionist political economic oligarchs are
certainly guilty of providing material aid to Zionist terrorism. Of course, it
would be much more satisfying to do the forensic accounting to find the actual
criminal financial acts of the Zionist oligarchs, but not only are such
prosecutions difficult and lengthy, but so many of the computers containing
critical data are about to go to seed in bankruptcies like that of Lehman
Brothers that piecing together the economic crimes will be difficult.
My wife often compares Zionism to an international criminal
conspiracy. The Feds put Al Capone away on the basis of tax evasion. Putting the
Zionist oligarchs away on the basis of providing material aid to terrorism is a
similar legal strategy that would benefit all Americans except for American
Zionists, who have been responsible for so much mayhem over the last 60 years
that they deserve far worse than they are likely to receive once Americans can
discuss Palestine without control and censorship by Zionist gatekeepers.
After the Jewish Zionist dons and capos are arrested, tried,
and convicted, their approximately $200-300 billion worth of seized assets can
be put into a US sovereign wealth fund to benefit the American public, and the
fund managers could work to clean up the economic crisis by creating the basis
of a new transparent international finance system in concert with major
European, Chinese, and Arabic banks and finance institutions. The new financial
organizations and structures will replace Wall Street which has probably been
fatally poisoned by Zionism.
Yet, merely applying US law equally to Jews and non-Jews in
America and merely creating a new finance system still leave unaddressed three
of the above four crises. We Americans have to start talking more fairly and
more realistically about the Middle East.
Neocons Made 5 Million Refugees, I point out the following.
According to the International Herald Tribune,
World refugee population jumps to 11.4 million in terms of UNHCR
responsibility. The article explains that approximately 5 million
refugees result from US Iraq and Afghanistan policy, which has been crafted by
Neocons acting as a Jewish special interest group. The article does not
mention how many have become refugees because of Jewish Zionist Neocon
manipulation of US policy in Somalia and the Sudan.
The IHT refugee numbers do not include Palestinian refugees, who
number at least five million under the aegis of UNWRA and whose existence
results from Jewish Zionist racist aggression and rapaciousness.
If so many people have become refugees as a result of Zionist
expansion in the Middle East and as a result of the efforts of a racist Zionist
intelligentsia in the USA, shouldn't we be considering the removal of the
criminal genocidal Zionist population of thieves, interlopers, and invaders from
Stolen and Occupied Palestine as part of the program to stabilize the ME and
restore US credibility and moral high ground?
The lack of any such open national discussion in the
USA indicates how much Zionism has eaten away American liberties and how much
4-500 Zionist oligarchs have come to dominate US politics both
From an American standpoint it might make more sense just to
remove the Zionist interlopers from Stolen and Occupied Palestine and then
return the country to the native population.
Millions of Palestinians have been exiled from their homeland
for far too long. If Zionists resist, we can simply cut off all funding to the
Zionist state. Within four months it would fall apart as international loans
come due, and the Zionist economy dissolved. If the state did not collapse fast
enough, then a coalition of the more than willing could start giving racist
Jews-only cities like Netanya the Falluja-treatment.
If the Zionists threatened to use nukes, we have a lot of
If the USA wants to encourage respect for human rights,
support for democracy, and opposition to racism throughout the world, we have to
start treating Jews and Arabs equally throughout the world. Dismantling the
State of Israel would be a good start in that direction.
Once the State of Israel and its nukes are removed from the
international game board in the Middle East, the US might be able to
prove sufficient bona fides in the eyes of the Iranian government to work
out some sort of deal on nuclear weapons. It will still be tough because the
Iranians have to be nervous about the propinquity of four nuclear powers (India,
Pakistan, the Russian Federation, and the US in occupied Iraq), but conditions
in the region have some similarity to those when Nixon recognized the PRC as the
legal government of China and withdrew recognition from the RoC.
Eliminating Israel and allying with Iran makes similar sense
from a realist standpoint and will make it possible for the USA to enter into a
dialogue with all the Gulf regional powers to create a new solid political
economic order more in line with American interests and ideals than the current
Zionism inspired disaster.