“It is ironic that anti-racists are
willing to challenge the Jewish establishment’s view of the
holocaust but not the issue of Jewish world domination”, writes
Bob Finch in this second powerful essay. He goes well beyond our
usual complaints. He does not stop at his critique of Zionism,
he is not being attracted by the holocaust debate. He takes up
the punch line of Shamir’s
Vampire Killers: “it is not a myth which sustains the Jewish
state – it is Jewish global power. It is power which sustains
myths”. Bob Finch goes for jugular, for the absolutely forbidden
question of Jewish power from our non-racist position. While
good people bewail the multibillion subsidies provided by
America to the Jewish state, Bob Finch states unashamedly: “But
these are not subsidies. They are tribute payments that the
vanquished pay to their conquerors.” He calls upon us to deal
with this question of power instead of secondary one, how it is
used. It is also refreshing that Finch avoids such cliché
euphemism as “Israel Lobby” or “Israeli influence”, but refers
us to the true culprit – the organised Jewry. He concludes: “It
has become absurd to believe that the JOS is an American colony.
On the contrary, America now resembles a Jewish colony. America
is not merely ruled by a Jewish elite, it has become the biggest
prize in the global Jewish empire.”
America Vanquished
By Bob Finch
Historically, holocaust denial has been a
political tactic used primarily by extreme right wing political
parties. However, a small number of anti-racists have gone
beyond criticisms of the racist policies of the Jews-Only state
in Palestine (JOS) to question various aspects of Jewish
holocaust propaganda. These commentators believe such propaganda
is used politically to justify the oppression of Palestinians so
they hope that holocaust questioning might help to undermine
this oppression. Norman Finkelstein exposed the fabrications and
extortionate practices of what he’s called the Jewish holocaust
industry, ‘There’s no business like Shoah business’. Lenni
Brenner has highlighted Zionist collaboration with the Nazis in
the mass slaughter of Jews during the second world war (see
‘Zionism in the Age of the Dictators’ and also ‘51 Documents:
Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis’).
Since Ariel Sharon became the JOS’s prime
minister in 2001, the oppression of Palestinians has reached
such heights of obscenity that an increasing number of
anti-racists have joined the fray against Jewish holocaust
propaganda. Some have raised questions about particular facts
believed to have taken place during the second world war. Others
have questioned the so-called Jewish holocaust on conceptual
grounds e.g. that the holocaust is a racist concept for focusing
solely on the slaughter of Jews. Some anti-racists have
expressed doubts about the wisdom of enshrining the
establishment view of the Jewish holocaust in law and then
making it a criminal offence to challenge such a view. In 1963,
Hannah Arendt, one of the foremost scholars of totalitarianism,
estimated in ‘Eichmann in Jerusalem’ that the Nazis killed
between four and a half million to six million Jews. If she was
alive today and uttered such a view it is possible she would be
deemed a holocaust denier and even thrown in prison. Arendt’s
punishment for expressing such a view in the mid-1960s was
condemnation, and then ostracism, by Jewish communities around
the world but only the most extreme Zionists would have doubted
her historical scholarship or thought she deserved imprisonment.
There is no doubt the JOS has used holocaust
propaganda to legitimize its racist treatment of Palestinians.
The Jewish holocaust industry has exploited holocaust propaganda
to extort huge sums of money from European countries which were
then used to fund racist causes in the JOS. Anti-racists are
rightly and justly raising questions about the strong links
between what happened during the age of totalitarianism and what
the JOS has been doing to Palestinians over the last sixty
years.
It is paradoxical, however, that whilst some
anti-racists are now willing to engage in holocaust questioning,
the one issue they do not address, the last remaining Jewish
taboo, is Jewish political power. The only well known
anti-racist who has confronted this issue is Ralph Nader, “The
subservience of our congressional and White House puppets to
Israeli military policy has been consistent. They’re almost all
puppets. There are two sets: Congressional puppets and White
House puppets. When the chief puppeteer (Sharon) comes to
Washington, the puppets prance.” (Pat Buchanan ‘Ralph Nader:
Conservatively Speaking’ The American Conservative
http://www.amconmag.com/2004_06_21/cover.html June 21,
2004). Nader has never repeated this statement or elaborated
upon it or sought to use it as the basis for policies to counter
such distortions of political power. Perhaps the reason for this
is that nobody came to his defence when the Jewish lobby accused
him of anti-semitism. It has been quietly dumped into the
dustbin of history. (But even Nader considers Sharon, the PM of
JOS, ‘the chief puppeteer’ instead of seeing him as a minor
official in the bigger setup. ISH)
Anti-racists, like virtually everyone else in
the western world, maintain that America is the world’s
hyper-power. From this perspective, the JOS can be seen only as
an American colony - dependent on America’s military,
technological, and economic, support for survival. Anti-racists
are willing to risk being condemned as anti-semites for
challenging the racist nature of the JOS. They are willing to
endure condemnation for casting the merest conceptual or
empirical shadow over the establishment view of the so-called
Jewish holocaust. But, they are not willing to challenge the
Jewish taboo over the idea of Jewish political power in the
western world, "It is an old canard that Jews control America
and American foreign policy," Foxman said. "During both world
wars, anti-semites said that Jews manipulated America into war.”
(Jeffrey Blankfort ‘A War for Israel’
http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html
April 2004). But what better way is there of camouflaging Jewish
world domination than behind such a hoary old canard? Indeed,
the fact that this taboo has become an accepted norm throughout
the western world is yet one more piece of evidence pointing to
the existence of Jewish world domination. It is ironic that
anti-racists are willing to challenge the Jewish establishment’s
view of the holocaust but not the issue of Jewish world
domination even though, politically, their reasons for doing the
former also apply to the latter.
Andrew Winkler's article 'Deadly Chess Game'
is a classic of this genre. Winkler believes "Iran is also
threatening the moral and ideological base of Israel: the
'Holocaust Myth'." He encourages the left to re-examine the
propaganda of the Jewish holocaust because he believes this
would threaten the survival of the JOS. "If world-opinion came
to believe, as an increasing number of historians claim, that
the Holocaust was nothing but a propaganda lie, designed
pre-dominantly for the purpose of mounting support for the
creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, it would become
impossible for the US government to continue pumping billions of
Dollars in military and financial aid into its de-facto colony
Israel and backup Israel's brutal oppression of the Palestinian
people through the ruthless abuse of its veto right in the UN
Security Council." (Andrew Winkler 'Deadly Chess Game'
http://therebel.org/ Feb 16th 2006).
Whilst Winkler is willing to engage in
holocaust questioning because it politically undermines the JOS
he continues to support the conventional idea of the JOS as an
American colony. This stance leads him to a somewhat distorted
conclusion, “The Jewish State wouldn't even exist, if it weren't
for the combined effort of the Zionist lobby, US government and
Stalin, of making the world believe in the Holocaust.” The
so-called Jewish holocaust is certainly used politically around
the world to evoke political sympathies for the JOS but it is
not a myth which sustains this apartheid regime – it is Jewish
global power. It is power which sustains myths. Without
power myths cannot survive. The prevalence of a myth is a
pointer to the power which sustains it. Is it not a little
bizarre to believe that the “Zionist lobby” would spend time and
money promoting a myth in the hope of winning the world’s
approval for the survival of the JOS, when it can manipulate
America into providing the JOS with military and political
protection irrespective of world opinion?
The idea of the JOS as a mere American
satellite or colony dates back to October 1973 when president
Richard Nixon airlifted military supplies to the beleaguered
Jewish army to save it from defeat by Arab armies. At the time,
this rescue was commonly perceived as America coming to the aid
of an ally. It was this highly dramatic event which led to the
image of the JOS as an American colony. Since then this view has
become a commonly accepted opinion throughout the western world.
It has been given the seal of approval by western academia.
Zionists love the image because although it seems to demean the
stature of the JOS, it once again allows the JOS to present
itself and, by proxy, Jews around the world, as innocent
victims.
The best known intellectual exponent of the
proposition that JOS is an American colony is Noam Chomsky. His
promotion of this view helped to justify its acceptance by those
on the left, the anti-apartheid movement, the anti-war movement,
and even by liberals. Chomsky is the chief Rabbi of the left who
absolves the JOS of guilt and responsibility for its apartheid
regime and its military belligerence against neighbouring
countries. The implication of seeing the JOS as an American
colony is that America has ordered the JOS to do everything for
which it has become despised, so all blame and all
responsibility must be placed on Americans not the JOS. Thus
Chomskyism proposes that the American government was to blame
when Ariel Sharon invaded the Lebanon because it forced him to
fight a war he did not want to fight! The clever racist
assumption that Chomsky allows to fester here is that what he
means by ‘America’ is a country ruled by White Anglo Saxon
Protestants (WASPs). Since he refuses to countenance the idea of
Jewish power in America, let alone Jews controlling American
politics, the only people who could be responsible for ordering
Sharon to engage in violence, terrorism, and warfare at every
opportunity are American WASPs!
Given Chomsky’s intellectual stature and
authority, few on the left have dared to challenge his
preposterous, immoral and racist, views. Jeffrey Blankfort is
one of the few – see for example ‘The Israel Lobby and the Left:
Uneasy Questions’
http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html
c.2004). See also Réseau Voltaire’s interview of Blankfort (‘The
Chomsky/Blankfort Polemic’
http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs_TheChomskyBlankfortPolemic.php
February 20, 2006).
According to Blankfort, Chomsky’s “attempt to
portray the US-Israel relationship as mirroring that of
Washington's relations to its client regimes in El Salvador,
Guatemala, and Nicaragua, has no basis in reality.” Blankfort
argues, “Also, there were no Salvadoran, Nicaraguan or
Guatemalan lobbies of any consequence in Washington to lavish
millions of dollars wooing or intimidating members of Congress;
no one in the House or Senate from any of those client countries
with possible dual- loyalties approving multi-billion dollar
appropriations on an annual basis; none owning major television
networks, radio stations, newspapers or movie studios, and no
trade unions or state pension funds investing billions of
dollars in their respective economies. The closest thing in the
category of national lobbies is that of Miami's Cuban exiles,
whose existence and power the left is willing to acknowledge,
even though its political clout is miniscule compared to that of
Israel's supporters.” (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘The Israel Lobby and
the Left: Uneasy Questions’
http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html
c.2004). It is ludicrous to regard the JOS as if it was little
different from a country like Honduras which is dominated by an
American multi-national corporation producing a single
monocultural crop. Hondurans do not own a substantial proportion
of the American media and pump out an endless stream of Honduran
propaganda on behalf of national interests of the Honduran
state. They do not posses a hugely wealthy lobby which bribes
members of congress into passing legislation supporting
Honduras's foreign policies. There are not huge numbers of
Honduran intellectuals in America producing policy papers
outlining new foreign policies for America which, completely
coincidentally, are the same as Honduras’s foreign policies.
There are not large numbers of Hondurans serving in the Bush
administration. It has to be concluded that it is impossible to
see the JOS as an American colony.
This is not the place to outline the history
of the Jewish takeover of American politics and the rise of
Jewish global domination. Suffice it to say the JOS has used its
nuclear weapons or military power to blackmail America into
giving it whatever support it needs and that the Jewish lobby
has manipulated various American administrations into fighting
proxy Zionist wars. It was pointed out above that America’s
airlifting of military supplies to the JOS during the October
1973 war gave rise to the now commonly accepted view of the JOS
as an American colony. But this interpretation of the airlift is
erroneous. Nixon was confronted with the choice of protecting a
country with no oil or an Arab world with a super abundance of
oil. To all those left wingers who have for decades blithely
insisted that America is interested in the Middle East solely
because of oil such a decision should have been a no-brainer.
There is no conceivable reason based on America’s national
interests why Nixon should have chosen to support the JOS rather
than the Arab world. (Please do not suggest that America saw the
JOS as essential because the Jews provided political and
military services for America it could not provide for itself.
Any number of Arab regimes could also have provided exactly the
same services if asked. Saddam Hussein was all too willing to
carry out services for America - but when he expected Americans
to pay for these services they decimated his army). The most
plausible reason for Nixon’s decision is that the JOS used its
nuclear weapons to blackmail Nixon into providing it with
military assistance even though he knew such a decision ran
counter to America’s interests. Nixon must have known the Arab
world would retaliate by establishing an oil embargo that would
severely damage America’s economic and national interests. And
this is precisely what happened. The embargo pushed America and
the global economy into an economic recession that lasted nearly
a decade. The JOS blackmailed Nixon into sacrificing American
interests for the sake of the interests of the JOS. “the
decision to give $2.2 billion in emergency military aid during
the October War triggered an Opec oil embargo that inflicted
considerable damage on Western economies.” (John
Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt ‘The Israel Lobby’
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd
2006). In other words, America spent $2.2 billion in military
aid which then cost it hundreds of billions of dollars in lost
economic development. This pattern of American sacrifice has
been repeated ad nauseam ever since. What the 1973 airlift
really symbolizes is the JOS’s power to extract whatever it
needs from America to boost its own interests even at America’s
expense.
It is often mentioned that America provides a
huge annual subsidy to the JOS. Over the decades this has
amounted to something in the region of $150 billion. “Since the
October War in 1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level
of support dwarfing that given to any other state. It has been
the largest annual recipient of direct economic and military
assistance since 1976, and is the largest recipient in total
since World War Two, to the tune of well over $140 billion (in
2004 dollars).” (John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt ‘The Israel
Lobby’
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd
2006). But these are not subsidies. They are tribute payments
that the vanquished pay to their conquerors.
Since the October 1973 war Jewish power in
America has grown immensely. Jews now constitute America’s
ruling elite. There is no longer any necessity for the JOS to
use its nuclear weapons or military power to blackmail America
into fighting wars on its behalf. Jewish political power in
America is now so dominant it can politically manipulate the
country into wars for the benefit of the JOS – even if these
wars are contrary to America’s national interests. Over the last
decade and a half, America’s Jewish ruling elite has manipulated
America into two proxy Zionist wars. The first was to remove
Saddam from Kuwait and the second was the invasion of Iraq. A
third one against Iran is pending even though such a war could
lead to the political, economic, and military, collapse of the
United States. “When a parasite invades, it hides as long as it
can, sucking the vital juices and draining the energy of its
host. Yet there is a limit to what the host can tolerate:
eventually, it either builds up an immunity to the depredations
of its "guest," or it is sucked dry and exhausted to the point
of near-death. Having used up nearly all available military and
economic resources in Iraq, the U.S. has a choice: it can either
build up an immunity to Israeli influence, even a partial one,
or it can let itself be turned into a dry husk, a casualty of
Tel Aviv's ambitions.” (Justin Raimondo ‘Spy With a Heart of
Gold?’
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8441 January 25,
2006). The JOS and the Jewish lobby in America doesn’t care how
much it costs America to fight proxy Zionist wars or how many
American troops are injured or killed as long as these wars
boost the regional power of the JOS in the Middle East.
Over the last decade or so the Jewish
colonization of the American political system has been
comprehensive. The JOS’s defence strategy has been adopted by
America. Its foreign policies have been adopted by America. The
JOS’s contempt for international institutions and international
law has become a critical part of American politics. Its enemies
have now become America’s enemies even though they pose not the
slightest threat to America. The racism endemic in the JOS has
now become rife throughout American politics. This amazing
political transformation did not happen because a group of WASPs
sat down and looked into a crystal ball to determine which
policies would maximize America’s interests over the long term.
These policies were introduced by Jews living in America who put
the interests of the JOS first. They were then pushed through
the American political system by the combined weight of the
Jewish lobby, the Jewish dominated media, and the increasing
proportion of Jews in successive presidential administrations.
"With the assault on Iraq," wrote the distinguished historian,
David Hirst, "the U.S. was not merely adopting Israel's
long-established methods - of initiative, offence and
pre-emption - ; it was also adopting Israel's adversaries as its
own...” (quoted in Jeffrey Blankfort ‘A War for Israel’
http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html
April 2004).
At its annual conference this year AIPAC
boasted that over the previous year it had managed to persuade
the American Congress into passing one hundred pieces of
legislation for the JOS. “AIPAC helps pass more than 100
pro-Israel legislative initiatives a year through more than
2,000 meetings with members of the U.S. Congress, according to
AIPAC statistics.” Despite the fact that two of AIPAC’s most
important employees are currently on trial for treason against
the United States, America’s politicians turned out in force to
pay homage to their AIPAC paymasters, “AIPAC’s influence was
underscored by the seeming multitude of government leaders in
attendance at the conference, the biggest in its 52-year
history. This year, half the Senate, a quarter of the House and
many White House administration officials, including vice
president Dick Cheney, participated.” (Denyse Tannenbaum
‘“European media is questioning Israel’s right to exist”’
www.ejpress.org/article/6686 March 10th 2006).
The JOS is a racist rogue state and, over the
last decade and a half, it has transformed America into a rogue
hyper-power with increasing racist tendencies. It has become
absurd to believe that the JOS is an American colony. On the
contrary, America now resembles a Jewish colony. America is not
merely ruled by a Jewish elite, it has become the biggest prize
in the global Jewish empire. It is quite true that the American
military remains the world’s only hyper-power but it is
America’s ruling Jewish elite which controls America’s military
not WASPs. Many of America’s WASP military leaders are aghast at
the idea of being ordered to attack Iran and yet this is
precisely the direction in which the American military is being
pushed by the Jewish dominated congress and Bush administration.
It is the Jewish elite’s takeover of the
American political system and its ability to use America’s
military hyper-power for the benefit of the JOS that gives rise
to Jewish global domination. However, Jewish world domination is
far from complete. For a time Russia was controlled by a Jewish
elite with allegiance to the JOS but Putin managed to wrestle
back control of his country for the sake of the Russian people
although whether he’ll be able to fight off the next Jewish
political assault is far from certain. In Britain, the ruling
elite is composed of Jews and the landowning aristocracy. The
aristocrats own much of the countryside whilst the Jewish elite
owns much of the country’s high streets. Whilst the former
dominates over domestic issues, the latter dominates in foreign
affairs.
There is little evidence that Jews started
the second world war. But currently there are many Jewish
commentators trying to provoke world war three (or world war
four depending on which commentator you are listening to).
During its lifetime, the JOS has created millions of victims in
Palestine, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq, and it is
about to create a whole lot more if it manages to manipulate its
American colony into a long war against Iran, Syria, and rest of
the Moslem world in the Middle East. Under these circumstances,
it would be folly for political commentators to spend so much
time researching events surrounding the racist Jewish holocaust
that they fail to notice that Jewish political power is
promoting a new catastrophe not merely against six million
Palestinians but the Moslem world in the Middle East.
It is almost certainly true that Jews were
nothing like as much victims of totalitarianism as the racist
concept of the Jewish holocaust suggests – after all roughly 20
million Russians died during this time, far more than the number
of Jews. If anti-racists continue to focus on the so-called
Jewish holocaust, albeit in the hope of undermining legitimacy
for the JOS, they will perpetuate the fixation on Jews as
victims – the scope of their argument being confined to
determining what sort of victim the Jews were. The Jewish people
suffered terrible losses during the second world war but, since
then, the JOS has brought about a huge loss of life and, given
the chance, it will bring about even greater losses in the
future. It has to be suggested that stopping the next world war
is more important than dissecting the bowels of the last world
war.
The way in which Jews have acquired economic,
media, and political, power in America and other western
countries since the end of the second world war until they are
now able to push the world’s military hyperpower to the brink of
a third world war, is an issue on which almost no research has
been done. (A new work on this issue has just been published as
this article was being written - John Mearsheimer and Stephen
Walt ‘The Israel Lobby’
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd
2006). In comparison, the amount of research into the so-called
Jewish holocaust is huge. Surely ascertaining how Jews living in
America acquired political power in America, and what they are
going to do with it, is a more urgent priority than politically
exploiting events that happened 60 years ago?
By far and away the most important political
issue at present is Jewish world domination. What matters is not
the second world war brought about by the German master race but
the third world war currently being instigated by the Jewish
master race. Times have changed. The JOS is now far more
powerful militarily than the nazis ever were. The JOS is
creating so many millions of victims it is drawing ever closer
to the total achieved by the nazis. Jews around the world
currently agitating for the third world war are just as much
racist supremacists as the nazis who provoked the second world
war. Blair and Bush are modern day Chamberlains giving succour
to the world’s new nazis – the Jewish master race.
There are many facts and figures in the works
of Jeffrey Blankfort that could contribute towards making the
case for Jewish world domination. He does not use such a phrase
– he talks only of the Israelization of America’s Middle East
policies. His focus has been primarily on the Jewish lobby in
America so he has overlooked the critical role of the JOS’s
nuclear and military blackmail in transforming America’s foreign
policies. He has also failed to appreciate the role the JOS is
playing in fostering a Greater Kurdistan to help break the
Arabs’ grip on the Middle East. But he has inadvertently raised
an important issue in any understanding of the nature of Jewish
world domination. Is the world’s global Jewish elite so attached
to capitalism and profiteering that it has become entirely
rootless with no political loyalties to any particular country?
Or is it so committed to Zionism that it would be willing to
sacrifice profits and perhaps even capitalism itself if this
ensured the political and military supremacy of the JOS in the
Middle East and beyond? This issue bears upon whether there will
be a war against Iran. If the global Jewish elite is like the
former then it will avoid an attack on Iran because such a war
could seriously damage the global economic system. If, however,
it is like the latter then it will demand a war because no
matter how much the world, or the capitalist system, or America,
might be damaged it would be a huge boost to Jewish supremacism
in the Middle East. “If there are truly elites who are pulling
the strings in Washington and control Tel Aviv, as we are often
told, there will be no attack because those elites would
certainly be aware of the consequences it will have for the
free-market capitalist system that they cherish. If there is an
attack, it will be yet another proof that Washington is Israel's
most important occupied territory, despite the efforts of a
handful of brave individuals there to expose and bring a halt to
the Israelization of US Middle East policy. I don't like the
concept of elites, but I do not think there will be an attack
and that the drum beats are designed to scare Iran because there
are no other realistic options available. Nevertheless, beware
the Ides of March.” (Jeffrey Blankfort ‘War within Range?
Another Neocon beats the drums for war and says it will happen
in 10 weeks’
jblankfort@earthlink.net c. Jan 7th 2006). In
other words, does the Jewish global elite have a god-given
sanctuary in Palestine or does it not care about this Judaically
sacrosanct land?
This article does not present the case for
Jewish world domination. It suggests the time has long since
passed when the idea of Jewish world domination should be deemed
to be preposterous or treated as morally abhorrent. There is
plenty of evidence pointing in the direction of Jewish world
domination. For example: the willingness of American politicians
to criticize the president of the United States but their total
reluctance to criticize the JOS. Western governments’ acceptance
of the JOS as a western, liberal, secular democracy rather than
criticizing it for being a racist state. It is more absurd to
believe that America is the world’s hyperpower and that the JOS
is just an American colony than it is to believe in Jewish world
domination. This article seeks to change political priorities
from the so-called Jewish holocaust of the past to the Jewish
inspired catastrophe of a third world war. The so-called war
against terrorism is a racist war initiated by Jewish
supremacists designed to boost Jewish world domination. We can
either live in world that seeks to combat racism or in a world
where Jewish racism is accepted as a normal part of everyday
life. In the latter case Jews would rule the world.
Bob Finch
|